But that’s why it’s so nice that there are some gems who actually have scientifically backed formulations, or even better: contribute to science by doing studies and creating new categories!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 months ago

    P&G does some interesting anti-aging research involving genetics. I saw a talk about it some years ago when I was in chemistry graduate school.

    SK-II is therefore probably legit but it’s too expensive for me.

    • @akrzOPM
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      you just sent me down a 30 min google spiral hahah, thank you for the tip!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      In regards to safety, yes. They have to make sure you don’t develop a rash or something. Good thing there are regulations for that, otherwise at least some companies would try without that, too.

    • @akrzOPM
      link
      English
      011 months ago

      i mean if it is required for safety reasons then that’s okay imo

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        It’s not required though, many companies do just fine without the testing on animals while still being compliant.

        • @akrzOPM
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          Often those companies just use ingredients and formulations that have been tested on animals by other companies and the patent has run out/it is not patented. Companies doing animal testing probably would not do animal testing on such products too. Most companies try to avoid costs.