• zephyreks@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Older article, but still relevant.

    Idaho stops have been shown to reduce cyclist injuries and fatalities: https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2023/07/13/the-idaho-stop-a-step-forward-for-safety#:~:text=According to the U.S. National,fell by 23 per cent.

    Idaho stops work by making stop signs equivalent to yields and red lights equivalent to stop signs for cyclists. You still don’t run the traffic signal, but because the threat profile of a bike is different from that of a car, it does make sense that traffic rules should be different…

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only is it safer, but it makes cycling more appealing because you wont be stuck at a red light for 10 minutes when there are no cars around.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is a good point. Also on a bike you have no pillar blindspots, and sit up high, it is easy to see if the way is actuallu clear, rather than a car where you have to stick the nose into traffic to see if the way is clear at some intersections. it makes sense to treat stop as a yield.

  • [email protected]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ian Tootill with Sense BC thinks the Idaho Stop would have support in the Lower Mainland, where many people use their bikes to commute and are already using the practice.

    Basically if everyone is already doing it, why not make it law that it’s ok?

    It’s not like there were any cops out enforcing the current law. Has anyone ever seen a bicycle get pulled over? I’ve never seen it either as a pedestrian nor a driver.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope, but more people tend to follow laws if it requires less of a change in behaviour.