• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Source: I work at Amazon, and have worked on Alexa

    If you’re high enough level at Amazon to know for sure, you’re also high enough level at Amazon to almost definitely lie to people about it and other things as part of your job.

    So no, we will not be taking your word for it.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That doesn’t make any sense. If I were “higher up”, do you think I would be actually doing any IC work? I’d be in management, and probably won’t even know where to look at any of the fucking source code.

      Feel free not to take my word for it, but also feel free to ask anyone that has any experience with Alexa, or anyone that has monitored traffic leaving the device.

      Is Lemmy just full of conspiracy nuts or something?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I were “higher up”, do you think I would be actually doing any IC work

        If you weren’t, why would you have access to enough data to know for sure whatv every part of it does and doesn’t do?

        free to ask anyone that has any experience with Alexa, or anyone that has monitored traffic leaving the device.

        So basically biased people and people who might lose their jobs if they say anything Amazon doesn’t want people to know? Sure, sounds credible!

        There’s conspiracy theories and then there’s expecting that a company that has been proven to spy on people without their knowledge will spy on people without their knowledge.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not how it works, at all, at ANY tech company. I know, because Amazon has a shared GitFarm, with detailed documentation on how things work, and most importantly the better part of a decade where no one inside or outside of the company has found the device “listening”.

          I said it elsewhere, but will repeat since you clearly have no idea about the tech industry. Amazon treats it’s corp employees like shit. If ANYONE was going to leak shit about their employer doing something shitty, it would be an Amazon employee, especially since their URA process is so widely known.

          IF Amazon get caught spying, they get everything that they deserve. I’ve never worked in the Ring org, so whatever they do is on them, and if they get caught being shitty with customer data they should be punished severely. What I can say, which (again) is backed by a decade of people not calling out the really-fucking-easily-verified fact that Alexa isn’t phoning home outside of the utterances you say to it. Wakewords don’t leave the device, they’re an offline trigger to get the “actual” content.

          I’ll repeat it again, this is an insane take that I haven’t experienced after a decade of posting on Reddit and Twitter. Why is the fediverse full of conspiracy theorists that don’t do basic research before making statements?

          • squidman64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            lol they are such stereotypical conspiracy theorists too, “of course you’d say it’s not true, that’s exactly what someone who was hiding the truth would say!”

          • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your general demeanor is atrocious.

            Genuinely.

            If you think they’re not spying then you’re just still way too low on the totem pole.

            You “work at Amazon” so I imagine you’re either deluded or intentionally misleading on purpose.

            It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It

        • Zangoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Tell me you’re not a software developer without telling me you’re not a software developer.

          If you’re working on the code the only thing that might change is not having access to the release/staging environments (production databases, cloud server, etc.) but you would need access to the code itself (and development database/services), so it wouldn’t be too difficult to check if the code is keeping voice recordings

          (italicized is edited in for clarity)

          Additionally, the higher up you are, the less code you usually write. With software development being higher up usually means more meetings, team management, planning, and higher level infrastructure talk.

          (Obligatory disclaimer that I’m pretty new in software development, this is the experience in the company I work at and seems to be pretty standard among other companies as well)

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So your theory as to why you haven’t seen evidence is that there’s a conspiracy of people withholding the evidence. I gotta ask, do you have evidence of that conspiracy?