• Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you’re confusing “anti authoritarian” with “cannot work in a team”, well that’s extremely worrying. Don’t engineers get introduced to ethics on the work place where you come from? “anti authoritarian” might as well mean “won’t agree to do anything dangerous just because your boss told you to”. Hence why the author refers to Millgram’s.

    • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Anti-authoritarian can lead to difficulties in coordination with other teams. I’m not saying it has to, but it can.

      Not doing something unethical from a moral standpoint makes you a good person, but not necessarily a good employee. But in the vast majority of cases engineers aren’t presented with morally dubious tasks.

      Not doing what you’re told because you think you know better is also anti-authoritarian, and definitely would be considered a bad trait to have for an employee.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You have a legal obligation to refuse to do something unethical, so it depends whose definition of “good” you’re looking at, the HR dep, or the engineering one.

        Not doing what you’re told because you think you know better still sounds better than blindly doing what you’re told. Employees following instructions they don’t understand, when talking about desk jobs, kills any motivation. Let them offer alternatives, and argue a bit. There’s a difference between disagreeing and misunderstanding, and I bet the anti authoritarian crowd is more bothered by the latter than the former