jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1150arrow-down1external-linkA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square73fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism https://sentientism.info/
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agothat’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoRight, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoeven among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agosentientism is compatible with deontology
minus-squarespud@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoaccording to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
https://sentientism.info/
that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
sentientism is compatible with deontology
according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)