Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoThe dreamlemmy.worldimagemessage-square251fedilinkarrow-up11.96Karrow-down142cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.92Karrow-down1imageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square251fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoIs that not a type of AI already?
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWell, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoSo why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
Is that not a type of AI already?
Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,