• HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    10 months ago

    …an extremely intoxicated Morris missed his opportunity when his family finally ran out of things to discuss, by which point he was slumped in his chair and mumbling to himself about pronouns.

    Fucking lol

  • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This isn’t even satire, I’m dealing with it now and the points listed are absolutely true.

    • rekabis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      My condolences.

      My family isn’t “of the left”, but even my Octogenarian parents either accept things as they are, or are just confused about them. It’s exceedingly rare for them to disagree against any progressive point with anything approaching a willfully ignorant position. Their biggest objections invariably involve the bandwagon effect, and not the actual subject itself.

  • blackluster117@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My Dad took a turn for the weird last night and was spouting the joys of Communism after half a bottle of tequila.

    • rekabis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Communism is wonderful in theory, however due to human nature I strongly suspect it may be forever out of our reach unless we somehow develop benevolent AGI to administer the system, who are largely incorruptible and cannot be influenced by humans.

      The problem isn’t that power corrupts, the real problem is that power attracts the corruptible.

      We need to make any significant positions of power inaccessible to humans, or have those positions filled by people who are truly randomly selected from the general population for only one term.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        there are plenty of communes on planet earth. and in my experience most art collectives (bands, improv groups, artist-owned galleries) all own their means and share the fruits of their labors even under a capitalist system.

      • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d like to put a little more nuance here and argue that this thing we call “human nature” doesn’t exist, or rather has very little impact. There were a couple of studies done about separated identical twins with identical genes, and the results did show a non-insignificant difference.

        With this in mind, if we assume that none of us are born inherently corruptable and that it’s how and where you were raised rather than whatever is in your genes, then wouldn’t the current system we live in also influence how we turn out, specifically in regards to what our current values for success are (high-up position, earning a lot of money, having power and so on)?

        I do agree that communism is a wonderful idea, but I disagree that AGI is the answer - humans can govern themselves as long as they’re raised in a specific way that discourages things that could lead to corruption or abuse of power, which might be an even more impossible task than creating an AGI, but I do believe it’s possible with more radical changes and correct people.

        Here are some studies about twins if you are interested: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922001477 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563825/

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “But human nature” is one of the shittiest arguments against communism because its just such nothingness. Like there’s not proof or scientific merit behind it. And when pressed all people can say is “but my anecdotal evidence!” Or “it’s just common sense” or something equally dismissive.

  • OpenStars@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    OMG clicking this link in Chrome reminds me why I extremely hate Chrome nowadays… (my own fault, I shoulda absolutely used Firefox, obviously)

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I thought The Onion was finally good again, but some of this new stuff is really phoning it in.

    Edit: not The Onion.

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, I have to tolerate those people at dinner just like everybody else. This just feels a bit like it’s been done already.

    • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sorry, I’m a little confused… Can you elaborate on what you mean by ‘phoning it in’? I’ve never heard that before (but I’m guessing it’s like ‘phoning a friend’ when you’re stuck in a quiz or similar?)

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Completing the task with little effort in a disengaged fashion. In this case the task would be writing a satire article.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve heard it for many decades in the acting world, usually when an actor isn’t trying hard in a performance and merely reciting the lines to get to the end of the show.

        The idea being you’re not actually there doing the work (metaphorically), you’re in bed at home phoning it in instead.

      • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It means giving a bare minimum of effort. Like when there’s an important meeting at work and you attend on the phone so you don’t have to get dressed or go anywhere. The term came about back when phones were low quality but still convenient, so phoning it in was easy, but frustrating to everyone else.