What if Meta’s hidden objective behind the Threads-to-Mastodon initiative is a play on app.net? And, what if threads.net is a measured step towards what could be the greatest pivot in all of tech?

  • Lmaydev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s nothing wrong with the people who use it. It’s their choice. I just don’t want that content in my space.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only space that is truly “yours” in the Fediverse is the one concerning your feed and the data you create.

      • Lmaydev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s my instance and the ones it federates with.

        I can move instance or host my own if I don’t agree with my current ones choices.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you treat the people on the same instance as you as “taking your space”? Wouldn’t it better to think of it as shared, which means that it is not really yours or anyone else’s?

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              And I am talking about the people on the networks, whether it is Facebook or the instances themselves.

              You want to say “I don’t want Meta to come”, but what about the people who are there?

              • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I dont mind, we are letting in a group that has a diffrent culture then ours. The fear is that if

                • we grow too fast
                • there is unreconcilable cultural diffrences
                • or a technological barrier for communication,

                then the smaller side’s culture will get clobbered.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If we don’t grow faster, we are always going to be irrelevant. To illustrate the point: Lemmy had a monstrous gift given by Reddit’s management and completely failed to capitalize on it. Later on, when my fediverser project was signing up hundreds of people per day and the conversations started by the bots were used by organic users in niche communities, the reactionaries here decided to treat everything as spam, instead of seeing it as a hook to convert more people.

                  Fast forward a few weeks, and now Lemmy is back to being a place to nothing but meta-conversation about the Fediverse and a handful of people pretending they are not using Reddit anymore.

                  • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Yes theres also a lower bound, the upper bound can and should be as high as it should go but im afraid the biggest hurdle to having safe high growth is the possable culture clash. I fear (educated guess) it will happen and im hoping it wont.

                    Also, from your example, reddit is not exactly the same culture as lemmy and we had a “what habits do you wanna keep (effectively adopt) or drop from reddit” post, stuff like “/s”. Id say overall few issues and should have and ive heard people encourage going as fast as possable but your saying our radicals pushed back.