• Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, if they leave, that tax revenue drops, meaning the goodies you gained may have to be dropped. The concern is whether it is sustainable long term

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What tax revenue drops? Before the change they weren’t paying the additional tax, and now they aren’t paying it if they leave, so nothing is lost on that account. The state loses whatever taxes they were paying originally; given that they’re annoyed enough to leave over an increase that suggests that they were already finding ways to minimize their tax payments. Thus, by them leaving, the state is likely losing a small amount of revenue. Given that each person has a cost to the state, the net effect will be even smaller.

      Surely there’s a point at which taxes drive away enough people that it doesn’t work, but it’s clearly not the case for this particular implementation.

      • MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what the tax bracket earning for this scenario is. I wonder what the difference is between the extra money a person earning a million dollars a year would be under this new tax guideline, versus the amount they were paying before. Now what’s the difference if they leave in state revenue?