Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoStatsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1792arrow-down118
arrow-up1774arrow-down1imageStatsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squareAzzy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf an anthropologist found a 2-million year old intact foot, I think they’d call it a skeleton, sure.
minus-squareknorke3@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoi somehow have a feeling that they’d call that a partial skeleton (aka. less than one)
minus-squareAzzy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoehh, partial skeleton, skeleton, what’s the difference? a few missing bones never hurt anybody! /s
If an anthropologist found a 2-million year old intact foot, I think they’d call it a skeleton, sure.
i somehow have a feeling that they’d call that a partial skeleton (aka. less than one)
ehh, partial skeleton, skeleton, what’s the difference? a few missing bones never hurt anybody! /s