Nooooooo

  • RedQuestionAsker2 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t an issue of not understanding situation.

    They wanted to rightfully crack down on exploitative models, and porky got mad when his market started to tank. Simple as.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh for sure, but people still reacted negatively. The idea was good, but the way it was implemented was not. That’s more what I’m getting at.

        • darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well they could have done it more gradually and that may have been the better move. Take 3 steps to get to each goal over a number of years with the ability to stop half-way if needed. Instead of outright going for the throat in this maybe just the ban on harmful incentive systems that force players to log in daily or fall behind. That by itself would have had western gamers cheering for the most part as aside from a few deeply in denial addicts most people don’t like being controlled like that.