~n (@[email protected])
chaos.social
This is fine... "We observed that participants who had access to the AI assistant were more likely to introduce security vulnerabilities for the majority of programming tasks, yet were also more likely to rate their insecure answers as secure compared to those in our control group." https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03622

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/8121843

~n (@[email protected]) writes:

This is fine…

“We observed that participants who had access to the AI assistant were more likely to introduce security vulnerabilities for the majority of programming tasks, yet were also more likely to rate their insecure answers as secure compared to those in our control group.”

[Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03622?

  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    26·
    1 year ago

    A worrying number of my colleagues use AI blindly. Like the kind where you just press tab and not even look. Those who look spend a second before moving on.

    They call me anti-AI, even though I’ve used chatGPT since day 1. Those LLMs are great tools, but I am just paranoid to use it in that manner. I rather it explain to me how to do the thing instead of doing the thing (at which it is even better).

    EDIT: Typo

    • Spzi@lemm.eeEnglish
      5·
      1 year ago

      Those LLMs are great fools, but I am just paranoid to use it in that manner.

      Exquisite typo. I also agree to everything else you said.