• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2175 months ago

    Could we, like, leave the clickbait headlines to reddit? Thanks. The queer.af admins just decided – wisely – not to renew the domain considering who the fee would go to.

    • Hal-5700XOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -345 months ago

      The queer.af admins just decided – wisely – not to renew the domain considering who the fee would go to.

      So the Taliban being in control of the .af domain. Made the admins not to renew the instance. To put in away, “The instance has been killed by the Taliban.”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        325 months ago

        No. The instance being killed by the taliban is the opposite of that is happening here.

        The taliban has done nothing, in this case. The admins of the instance have chosen not to keep the instance due to not wanting to fund the taliban in anyway.

        This phrasing fucks up which way the action flows, which is important for a headline to get right to remain accurate to the story. Does that make sense?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        Nah the admins killed the instance before the Taliban could at best, kill it, at worse proxy it and gather information.

        Seriously gaining control of a domain can allow you to do pretty nefarious things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    956 months ago

    Reading that headline scared me. For a moment I thought the instance owner was killed by the Taliban.

    • Quokka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      496 months ago

      If the Taliban take over Australia I’ve got bigger issues to worry about than my domain name.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 months ago

        that’s why australia has their army of spiders

        • Funwayguy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 months ago

          God help us all if we have to break out the Emus

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        Yeah that’s true. We just need to research who owns the TLD before long-term site and everything is ok.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            I’m sure Google didn’t buy those for the purpose of actually using them, but rather to prevent someone else from registering and using them.

              • Echo Dot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It’s Google, probably just bought them on the off chance that they would ever do anything with them.

                They are a company where the left hand doesn’t talk to the right hand very often anyway.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                05 months ago

                Two businesses can trademark the same name if they are operating in different industries. Or, the name could have spaces or punctuation that renders the same as a TLD.

                Go Ogle Photographic & Paparazzi Inc. could have a reasonable claim to the same .google TLD. The registration fee is chump change for Google/Alphabet to make sure this can’t happen.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        .io is the British Indian ocean’s territory, probably not really a risk i doubt anything’s going to happen there.

    • radix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      What alternatives are there? Just the big .org, .com, .net ones?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If you’re on the country code, you open yourself up to risk. ml has been a risk before.

    Your headline is misleading though. Taliban didn’t kill it. Admin did.

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      165 months ago

      Such a heinous click bait, I’m inclined to down vote the post. Definitely misleading af.

    • Hal-5700XOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -275 months ago

      If the Taliban never got control of the .af domain in the first place. The Admin would have renew it. So the Taliban did kill it.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      285 months ago

      .ck is only available as subdomains - including the hilarious, co.ck.

    • @NekkoDroid
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Wouldn’t that need them to get the fu.ck domain itself? I have a feeling that is already used by someone else, but there currently isn’t any website at that domain (doesn’t mean it isnt used)

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        306 months ago

        Worst hypothesis they just need to mess around a bit. For example I don’t think that queerasfu.ck would be registered.

    • Adam
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Activitypub makes it next to impossible to “move” an instance to a new domain.

      Every post/comment/and user is uniquely identified using the domain. In the eyes of ActivityPub changing the domain just makes each of those things a completely new thing.

      You can set up a new service at your new domain and potentially get most all your users to migrate but they’ll be leaving behind their entire histories and as a “new” fediverse user they’ll only be discoverable via the historical posts for as long as the original server is reachable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Thats IMO one of the worst engineering decisions in the protocol, besides all the others, but this one (making identity depend on domains, meaning on third parties antithetical to decentralization) is… laughable. Who was responsible for it?

        • Adam
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          But, the theory goes, you’re not supposed to be reliant on third parties as you should be in control of your own domain (or within a few degrees of the person who is).

          Large instances are what are antithetical to decentralisation.

          Of course, the reality of it is that, it just hasn’t worked out like that.

      • NekuSoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not sure how well this would actually work, but couldn’t the admins “copy” the instance to the new domain and then initiate an account migration from the old to the new instance for every account? That should both push out the account transfer to all the other instances and preserve the post history as well.

    • Hal-5700XOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -6
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What a bad taste title

      For who…The Taliban?

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That it’s objectively false to stir up attention

        Your title implies it was directly killed, when it factually was not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 months ago

    They could have renewed it just for the irony. Even if it means giving some money to the Taliban.