In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Trump’s cultist ass should be getting crushed.

    Makes me wonder what might have happened if the DNC hadn’t f**ked Bernie over, twice.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It hurts me to think how much better a position we would be in right now if they hadn’t worked so hard to marginalize him.

      Imagine how many lives would have been saved on just the pandemic disinformation alone.

      And Bernie would have absolutely demolished cheetolini in the debates.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe he would have lost his aura because he wouldn’t have had the means to do what he says should be done.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Maybe he would have lost his aura

        At this point Bernie’s lost at least some of it; I can’t disagree with those who’ve accused him of sheepdogging, although I think he was trying to do the best he could with what he had.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout. Frankly they deserved it for what they did to him and his show of weakness backing the warhawk Clinton was awful to see from someone who usually has so much fire.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Bernie’s moral code includes supporting his party’s “democratic” ways, as anything else would be a coup in its own right.

            Even if I believe he’s off the mark in doing that, I admire him for it. It’s rare to see these days.

              • Xhieron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                What alternative would you propose? Say what you will about Sanders, but he actually wants the Republic to last, imperfect though it may be. Apparently many of his critics prefer a politician who will throw a tantrum if things don’t go his way and then try to bring down the whole nation. That reminds me of someone else.

                  • Xhieron@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Your change involves kids in cages, dead immigrants in rivers, American military deployment in American cities, assassinated political opponents, and dead women in American hospitals. I think I prefer Joe Biden.

                    Just to be clear–I’m not a fan of the ongoing Palestinian genocide. It’s reprehensible. But Biden didn’t cause that. The US supports the state of Israel for complex geopolitical reasons that aren’t that different from why it also supports other regimes that lack stirling human rights records, and those reasons date back nearly a hundred years. That’s realpolitik, and you might not like how the diplomatic sausage is made. It’s not pretty for the US, and I hate to be the one to break it to you, but it’s not pretty for other nations either. But guess what? If Bernie Sanders were president, or if Donald Trump were president, you know what would be different about America’s foreign policy position re Israel? Not a goddamned thing. Because this is as good as it gets. It’s a calculated diplomatic position. Not pretty, and not fun politically, but every alternative is as morally black or worse, and absolutely worse for US interests.

                    The US is an empire. It does empire things. Sometimes I don’t like those things. But I live here. So yeah, 1000 years sounds nice. Certainly beats trying to kill the whole experiment in less than four. That’s what the other guy wants. Personally, I’d rather keep it around to try to do some fixing.

                    But keep it coming with the hyperbole if it makes you feel righteous.

          • spider@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout.

            Technically it’s not his own party since he’s an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, but otherwise I know exactly what you mean.

    • Rusticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well progressives are to blame for their incessant whining that any candidate that is not 100% progressive is absolute shit. Progressives are bitching about PEOPLE while corporatists are controlling the narrative about ISSUES.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Progressives are bitching about PEOPLE while corporatists are controlling the narrative about ISSUES.

        Progressives have been banging the drum for universal health care (an ISSUE) for years, so far with no luck – (no) thanks to the corporatists.

        And as for Israel (also an ISSUE), don’t get me started…

        • Rusticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          The whole point is that progressives are getting CRUSHED by the corporatists because the whiners can’t stop eating their own.

          • spider@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            progressives are getting CRUSHED by the corporatists

            Well yeah, because the corporatists control the purse strings.

            • Rusticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              11 months ago

              Until progressives learn to play and win the messaging game, we’re wasting our time. But it has to start with positive messaging not negative messaging. Trumpists have that market cornered.

              • spider@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Again, messaging takes money, and that’s controlled by the corporate wing of the party.

                Progressives are more or less wasting their time if they don’t leave the party.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s not a messaging issue. Boomers are intentionally voting against progressives and leftists in primaries because boomers are selfish pieces of shit who enjoy fucking over anybody younger than 65 years old.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            What on earth are you talking about? Progressives and leftists didn’t lose the 2020 primaries due to infighting. Having multiple candidates running with similar perspectives is a sign of a healthy movement. I wanted Bernie but I would’ve happily supported others.

            But Boomers couldn’t resist the chance to vote against progressive and leftist efforts and since Biden was the only viable procorporate trash candidate they rallied around him.

            Fuck the Boomers.