121 Apple workers have until the end of January to choose.

I’m sure women will be stoked to have Apple relocate them to a state that could kill them.

  • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
    1455·
    10 months ago

    Google is dropping the Assistant team, and Amazon is dropping the Alexa team. This sounds a lot like Apple is trying to avoid an explicit layoff and forcing employees to quit instead.

    Constructive dismissal lawsuit?

    Edit: see this comment https://sopuli.xyz/comment/6157509

    • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyiEnglish
      391·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, that’s what I was thinking. This could have the makings of constructive dismissal. Relocate to a place with vastly different legal protections or be fired? Hmm. Since it also would possibly disproportionately affect female employees, I wonder if some discrimination could also come in to play?

      Not a lawyer, just spitballing ideas.

      • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        10 months ago

        If they are offering a relocation package, and it sounds like they are, then this likely doesn’t fall under constructive discharge. Also in CA a constructive discharge lawsuit often only makes you entitled to the same benefits as if you were fired (i.e. severance and unemployment). These guys aren’t being fired for cause so they still qualify for unemployment and the severance deal Apples offering is probably already worth more than many would get in a lawsuit. A lawsuits not gonna force Apple to move the office back.

        I don’t know why everyone always jumps straight to “constructive discharge” and “this must be illegal”. Guys, we live in a legal hellscape, Apple may be being shitty but they aren’t doing anything illegal.

      • SheeEttinEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        No, it’s “move or be laid off”, not fired. There’s a difference. Being laid off means you get unemployment, at least in most states. Quitting or being fired for cause, you don’t. And Apple is giving them a little extra severance package.

        Apple is still shit for doing this, because presumably they’re doing it to get rid of people without doing a real team layoff, and because they’re moving to Texas.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      265·
      10 months ago

      Lawsuit of 100 people is laughable.

      Tech will never unionize, and because of that, are just shilling for billionaires so they can one day make it big. LMAO

      • namingthingsiseasyEnglish
        22·
        10 months ago

        The reason why American tech workers haven’t unionized is because when times are good, they think they don’t need a union, and when times are bad, it’s far too late.

        Source: reading too many of hopeless comments like this on hacker news

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          68·
          10 months ago

          Nothing those employees can do, they’re even being offered money and time off to move lol.

          Legally, 0 actionable items for a suit.

            • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              I don’t understand what kind of magic bullet people think a constructive discharge lawsuit is or what kind of powerful uno reverse card it would be. Winning a constructive discharge lawsuit is basically being legally fired instead of quiting…they’d probably get less from that lawsuit (not even counting the time and legal fees) than if they just accepted Apples package. What is a constructive discharge lawsuit supposed to do here?

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              I agree, but I don’t think that’s even close to a reasonable reason to sue.

              I don’t like that, but I’m just making the argument that the 1% doesn’t give 2 shits either way.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      15·
      10 months ago

      Not constructive dismissal, because the goal isn’t to place the burden on the employee. On whatever date, they will all be terminated without cause (layoff) if they choose not to relocate. There is no goal of forcing them to quit. Presumably, Apple has filed (or will file in due time) things like the WARN Act notification.

      This is a PR move to hide the layoffs from the general public, but not from the law.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      4·
      10 months ago

      Huh. So they’re all dropping their voice assistant teams. Is this because it turns out people only ever use them as voice activated kitchen timers because it turns out talking to computers sucks, or is some worse generative AI shit coming?

    • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.comEnglish
      41·
      10 months ago

      Even if it is constructively a dismissal, you can almost never sue someone for firing you in California.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      What seems to be going down is that tech firms are laying off AI teams that aren’t based on large LLMs like ChatGPT. My read: they’re thinking it’s time to lay off those workers in anticipation of replacing that functionality (in siri, cortana, echo/alexa) with a large LLM stack