• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    vast majority of people use the default app their phone choice comes with.

    historically eise, the reason EU uses whatsapp was that there was a time period early on where sms costed money, so people used whatsapp to circumvent that. the U.S didnt have that problem as sms was free for the majority of people in that time period.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This seems a bit revisionist. Everyone had an amount of smses per month that were free in their contract.

      People switched to whatsapp because it was better than sms.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not everybody, and not infinitely far back. There was definitely a period where there were no free texts included (although I do think that by the iPhone introduction many did have it, but still not all!)

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          its good to be clear that we are talking about a time period when people migrated to whatapp, and the reasoning for migrating to whatsapp. and how the ‘text for free’ thing wasn’t a big motivator, (nor was it a new idea)

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        And also because Whatsapp was available on every platform, from the dominant ones at the time (Nokia and Blackberry) to the newcomers (iOS, Android, even Windows Phone and more obscure ones like Samsung’s whatever it was called).

      • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        wasn’t it the long distance thing? charged for sending SMS outside of your network or something. I recall whatsapp was the way to text your parents from one country in to another, even in the EU.

        I know for a fact my fam adopted almost a decade ago, so we can text from USA to EU to SA to Canada. Family all over and it’s free.

    • WhiteHotaru@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      39 cents/SMS. I remember this time. This does not explain why it has to be that specific protocol, though.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        because people were already uaing sms when it was paid beforehand before smartphones were a thing. people just used to whatever the default was, especially since its not like everyone switched to a smart phone immediately after the iphone 3gs’ relase. sms was the default method to talk to people who were still using “dumbphones”

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, at the time, WhatsApp was pretty much the only option. Nowadays, there are a lot of other options.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        A part of it was that they put in the effort to support featurephones. People with smartphones always had other options.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was the other way around, the feature phones were funny at the time so not supporting them would have made no sense. And iPhones and Androids had just been launched at the time so there weren’t actually lots of options for them.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            WhatsApp was available for Blackberry, Symbian, and Nokia Series 40, and I’ve seen device support cited as an important part of its early success. It actually looks like Skype, AIM, and ICQ had pretty good support for various devices in the early 2010s too so I’m not sure that claim holds up.