I don’t get why Android phones have so much ram.

They often have more ram than my wife’s MacBook and the same or my as my desktop.

How much ram is needed if you’re not gaming or video editing?

In my case, it’s a very occasional picture or video recorded and then just social media apps and web. Do I need to get a phone with 12gb? Or is that just thrown in there for marketing?

  • OskarAxolotl@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    10 months ago

    Depends on the area. For most of the corporate world, nothing changed.

    Well, we are talking about consumer technology here.

    For the same reason you didn’t need 8gb of RAM just to open fucking Chrome back in 2010. Changing tabs was as instant back then on a shit computer as changing apps is nowadays on any phone, with significantly less resources needed for that.

    There isn’t quite another platform that has changed as dramatically as the web over the last few years. Just look at all those new APIs. Especially with the introduction of WebAssembly, we have reached a point where running actual software in the browser has become a viable option. Back in 2010, most websites consisted mainly of static content and maybe a bit of Flash and JavaScript here and there.

    Loads of apps are little more than glorified “single page browsers”, they just load a special version of the site with a couple extra bells and whistles. You can very easily run Spotify, Youtube, TikTok, Discord, Gmail, Xitter and more on a single browser and change tabs instantly with a single click.

    Do so and check your memory usage.

    And most games aim at the lowest common denominator (both regarding phone specs and “type of game”) because they want to reach the widest audience possible. A lot of people use Unity to make simple 2D games, yet that thing is bloated as all hell. Does it facilitate development? Absolutely. That doesn’t excuse it for being a mess.

    Having a look at the list of most popular mobile games, you will see that recent ones usually aren’t simple 2D games.

    As a side note, did you know that the PS2 had 32MB of RAM and its main CPU was a custom RISC running at 300MHz? You know, the console that let people play God of War 1 and 2, GTA San Andreas. “Oh, but its sole purpose was for gaming and it had a specific graphics core” - true, but once your application is front and center in a phone, it can hog 90% of the CPU and eat any free RAM, which, if your phone has 2GB total, and ~1.5GB is used by other apps and the system, you still have some 400MB to play with. The OS can get in the way and does add overhead, which ends up mostly being extra CPU time.

    That’s really not comparable at all. Games back then were specifically optimized for a single console with a single hardware configuration. Android apps today target millions of different devices and mostly aren’t even native. That’s just how it works and it isn’t really an issue since RAM has become dirt cheap. There isn’t really any downside to just having a lot of RAM when it only increases the price by a few dollars.

    A Galaxy S2, back on release, was really fast compared to its peers. Once its specs became mid-low end, it started to feel significantly slower, that’s true. Could’ve been the bloat catching up.

    Compared to it’s peers? Maybe. But it definitely couldn’t keep dozens of apps running in the background and allow immediate switching between them without reloads. Even with the lower requirements of apps back then.