I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don’t know why.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I knew a 3/4 deaf girl who had learned ASL, who had a bf who was fully deaf from birth… he did send her videos of himself signing.

        • pseudo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, it’s not like being handicaped is practical.
          People with disability have to deal with impractical situation all the time bc what is practical for able people is just not faisable or extremely unpractical for them, and society is far from being inclusive.

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      A decent amount of deaf people don’t speak English so wouldn’t be using written English. Schools that teach both are actually called dual language schools

      • DeadPand@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Deaf people that can’t hear at all, still read and write, please stop speaking for a lifestyle you don’t know anything about.

        • Devi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          😂 I’m deaf you numpty. There’s entire deaf communities that don’t read or write english. It’s actually a hotly debated topic as some think kids shouldn’t be forced to learn both.

          • Gabu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Only in 'murica (and the anglosphere) could people think that learning more languages could possibly be a bad thing…

            • Devi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

              We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

              If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

              • DeadPand@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early…

                • Devi@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You’ve got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

                  Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.

        • Devi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’ve got confused. A lot of deaf people speak ASL, BSL, AUSLAN etc exclusively. They don’t speak English. Speaking both is bilingual.