• -V0lD
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit

      • -V0lD
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The glass backs that this conversation started with

        • ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hate wireless charging too, though. It’s inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it’s plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

          Glass isn’t mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation.

            • ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I’m wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy.

              • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it’s now wasted both of our time :)

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging.

        So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn’t “premium” enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile