• hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    ok, but the cost of building a quanat is still pretty high and is not trivial to achieve.

    Can’t have water flowing everywhere in a country for this to work.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But don’t “swamp cooling” systems like the one in the OP not work well in humid environments? Sure, I have running water at home, but I also live in an incredibly humid climate.

        • egonallanon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was more imagine something like the opposite of a district heating system and then using colling ponds or towers to disappate the heat from the system…

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Modern plumbing uses pressurized pipes that are completely full of water, and can thus flow uphill, as long as the elevation gain doesn’t exceed the head pressure from the water tower or pumps. That makes such pipe systems relatively cheap and easy to build.

        In contrast, qanats require large conduits with space above for the air to flow through, using open channel flow. That means the entire system needs to be designed with a gentle downhill monotonic slope. That’s doable (the wastewater and stormwater sewer systems are designed that way, for example), but it’s more expensive and would require a lot of re-work if you wanted to convert over the existing water distribution system.