• Ross_audio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    It’s clear from the output that it breaks copyright.

    We don’t have to look inside the black box to demand to see the input which caused that output.

    To be clear a machine is not responsible for itself. This machine was trained to break copyright.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Generally if someone is clearly in breach of copyright the rights holder will apply to a court to issue an injunction to order that company to cease their activities until a case can be resolved.

      Given that has not happened, it seems that from a court’s perspective, it’s not a clear breach of copyright.

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        The rights holder first considers the size of the payout vs. the cost of legal fees.

        Just because they haven’t been sued directly for this doesn’t make it infringement.

          • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            The statute of limitations is much longer than a year. It’s usually around 5.

            They can wait, see who’s made the money, then target them for a payout.