Spotify CEO Daniel Ek says Apple’s new App Store changes are a ‘new low’::Spotify chief executive Daniel Ek said Apple’s new changes to its App Store in the EU are a “masterclass in distortion.”

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ahhh, nothing like the sound of a company being screwed by another company

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hear you but Apple’s stance on these issues also stops something like an F-droid Iphone equivalent.

        • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t think android could get away with doing something like this. The biggest company in the space (Samsung) has been pretty firm and intense about the samsung app store

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not like the idea of forcing everyone to pay a toll to use their operating system never occured to them. They had Apple to use as an example right from the start.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m closer and closer to getting rid of all proprietary software/hardware. Waiting patiently for my Sony and Fitbit to die out so I can replace them with literally anything but Android, preferably something that works with GadgetBridge.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          What replacements are you looking at for the Fitbit?

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No specific brands in mind but I’m also open for suggestions

            Preferably something with an SDK to be able to add custom functionality

            • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Dang I was hoping there was something you could tell me.

              Pinetime (or timeline, can’t remember which) might suit you, but I don’t think it’s ready for me. I don’t want another tinker device, I want something that just works, but I also don’t want a corporate spy device. I think I’m outta luck until pinetime is complete.

              • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                the amazfit bip is nice, if they’re still selling them. I’ve had mine for 4 years now. Transflective screen so the battery lasts a week+, and it works with gadgetbridge so zero cloud phoning-home. Not as many features as a full watchos or wearos watch, but it gives me notifications, and monitors heart rate with zero spying.

                Gadgetbridge is pretty awesome in general btw, it’s a fully open-source, fully offline app for managing and communicating with bluetooth things like smart watches and headphones. It’s on F-Droid.

        • grte@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not these ones specifically but that’s why I said, “these issues.” The way they run their app store and their stance on sideloading is all coming from the same anti-competitive strategy.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It has always been a possibility but apple’s business model is “be the biggest monopolistic piece of shit possible” so that’s always going to override anything but a law that forces them to not be a monopolistic piece of shit, something the EU attempted here, but apple made sure to find a way to say they’re following the law while simultaneously flouting it as hard as possible

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The users are the ones getting screwed. The costs of business are always passed to the customers. In the case of Google’s and Apple’s taxes this means all the customers and not even the ones doing IAP purchases because unlike actual sales taxes, apps aren’t allowed to charge them directly to the buyer.

      • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not true at all, just don’t buy through Apple/Google, buy off their website. Apps charge extra for IAP (vs online) all the time, I have no clue what you are talking about.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I wonder how much they can raise the price for the monthly Spotify subscription before people go back to pirating.

        • nivenkos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also 70% of any revenue increase goes straight to royalties, so it’s diminishing returns.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Funny it is to live, there’s never peace, always somebody trying to eat somebody else or avoid being eaten. So happy I’m neither company’s customer.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After sitting with our legal team to parse through the fine print of Apple’s DMA announcement (that took a while), which is, at best vague and misleading, I wanted to share my thoughts.

    Under Apple’s new changes, apps with over one million downloads will need to pay a “core technology fee” for “each first annual install per year.”

    That puts an app like Spotify — which Ek said has more than 100 million downloads in the EU — in an “untenable situation” because it drastically increases the cost of acquiring new customers.

    For its part, Apple said in a statement that it seeks to support developers, including Spotify, which it acknowledged as the world’s “most successful” music streaming app.

    While Apple’s tight hold over the iOS ecosystem has helped it reap billions in revenue, it has also caused it to run afoul of regulators who believe its tactics stifle innovation and suppress new entrants.

    Apple’s App Store change not only falls short of that ideal, but “mocks the spirit of the law and the lawmakers who wrote it,” Ek said.


    The original article contains 586 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh no! A billionaire doesnt like getting squeezed by another billionaire!!!

    Meanwhile, spotify pays the lowest rates to artists…