• Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    But what, practically, is the difference? If more and more websites use shit that only works in Chrome or Chromium based browsers, the effect is the same. The web doesn’t work as well for Firefox users.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      One is a browser following web standards and the other is a shitty company adding non-standards based development features intended to lock users into there browsers.

      It was shitty when Microsoft did the non-standard features to lock in with Internet Exporer and it is shitty that Chrome does it now.

      • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s shitty for sure, and I definitely think Chrome needs to die, or at least have better competition. Sadly, not enough users are using non-chromium browsers, that they don’t see a problem with using chrome only features. It sucks, and it’s going to lead (is leading) to the further enshitification of the web. I’m doing my part by using Firefox, and any web application I develop is guaranteed to work in Firefox.

    • pi3r8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      100% this. People loose the wood for the trees with these kinds of things. If something doesn’t work in one browser but does in another then 99% of people are not technical enough to understand or care why not. They just know it doesn’t work. That makes it a problem for Firefox. Whether it’s by their own making or not.