• Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a movement, isn’t it? That’s still a form of organization.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No it’s not. It has no members. It had no leaders. It’s just an idea. What do you think an organization is?

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        A movement can have members and leaders even without formal organizational hierarchy. It just won’t look the same as something like a corporation, nonprofit, or government. The person who noticed that the Proud Boys were coming to town and rallied people to a counter-protest? Definitely a leader. The people who show up on a cold rainy Saturday instead of staying indoors with a warm cup of tea? Members. Just because membership and leadership is more amorphous doesn’t mean it isn’t there in some form.

        • iso@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The person who noticed that the Proud Boys were coming to town and rallied people to a counter-protest? Definitely a leader

          Nahh you got that wrong. What usually happens is that a lot of people who are into politics (which left-extreme people often are) hear about this at the same time (through some press release, some proud boys twitter account who’s rallyin their followers, etc.).

          From that point the information spreads over friendsgroups, small discords, tweets, whatsapps, in person, slowly but steadily.

          Any left-extreme person who hears this immediately thinks “I’m mad, I wanna show those guys that they’re not welcome”. Granted, some of us think about much more extreme things, but back to the point. The first reaction from that thought is often “is there a counter protest?”. People are then doing the same thing but the other way around, as now everyone is trying to find some tweet, event, whatsapp message screenshot, whatever, of someone saying where the meeting point for an event would be. If none are found, someones gonna create something, which is usuqlly someone who’s got a lot of connections with other left-extremists. Often there’s multiple people creating the same counterprotest, which gets super messy at times, but somehow everyone manages to meet up in some general spot.

          Worst case you just have a bunch of friends groups going to the meeting spot of wherever the initial event is happening.

          That’s “the antifa”. A massive network of friends and friends of friends of friends who are all pretty aligned in their political views (which is “fuck Nazis”) but who often don’t know more then 5 other antifacists.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Often there’s multiple people creating the same counterprotest, which gets super messy at times, but somehow everyone manages to meet up in some general spot.

            This is kind of my point, in a way. It was maybe simplistic to use one person. There is leadership, but there are many leaders, and they don’t have a badge with “Antifa CEO”. Though someone really needs to make stickers with “Antifa CEO”. One of my former managers came from activist circles like antifa. She will always be my favorite manager because she is so great at making sure even shy people feel heard.

    • NostraDavid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      People are just nitpicking the meaning of the word Organization. Antifa is an organization in a very loose definition of the word. If you want to be more accurate, you’d call it a Network. Organizations (in the stricter sense) has a single leader and has a very tree-like structure with more power on top (like Corporations!), which Antifa obviously is not.

      Though you’re correct in that Antifa is a “movement”.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      In my opinion it would be a movement if facism was the status quo. Given most people are discussing Western nations, which while adopting facism at an alarming pace; are not yet facist. Antifa is not a movement nor an organization. Since not being facist is the status quo and antifa means that you’re not going to support facism, in my opinion antifa is the current “establishment” and being facist is an effort to move the status quo. Aka a movement.