kixik@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoGoogle’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the webarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1560arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1551arrow-down1external-linkGoogle’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the webarstechnica.comkixik@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square43fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareSamsy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI have to ask this, if I use grapheneOS with a Firefox browser like mull and my search engine isn’t google, do I have to give a fuck about this DRM bullshit?
minus-squarenehal3m@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoYes you do, because websites will filter out devices that can’t be remotely attested. You will be locked out of the commercial web.
minus-squarenehal3m@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s a tragedy to lose the open access web, yes.
minus-squareshiham@lemmy.shihaam.melinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoif websites you need start using it, then yes.
I have to ask this, if I use grapheneOS with a Firefox browser like mull and my search engine isn’t google, do I have to give a fuck about this DRM bullshit?
Yes you do, because websites will filter out devices that can’t be remotely attested. You will be locked out of the commercial web.
Ohh well, that’s sad, isn’t it?
It’s a tragedy to lose the open access web, yes.
if websites you need start using it, then yes.