• Senal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t expect logical thinking to be a strong characteristic in someone who’d threaten kids over a videogame.

        • Senal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          OK, so let’s assume that’s a good faith literal interpretation.

          Let’s try it this way.

          Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren’t generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

          I could however be wrong in this generalisation given I only have my experience to go on, if your experience leads you to believe people who threaten kids over videogames are not running with a logic deficit then your statement makes sense I suppose.

            • Senal
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              So, not a good faith take then, oh well.

              “Logical” is not a binary position. It’s a spectrum.

              Agreed, not sure how it’s relevant but it seems we agree on something after all.