• ebits21@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    All it would do is create an audit trail of your data to keep scientists honest. You can still iterate and change course but now you’re responsible for the record (if you look at the data at some point the data at that point could be recorded as is and a log keeps track when you check the data). Why did you change course and when? Was that appropriate? The data is verified when and if you decide to review it.

    How science is done has a problem, just suggesting a solution. I know that’s not how it’s done.

    All the data is a matter of record. It makes sure the raw data is ACTUALLY the raw data without bias. It makes sure you’re not ignoring negative results (a huge issue). Statistical detection of cheating will never be as good as reviewing the raw data and changes over time.

    As for scooping data, it’s a matter of the record now. There’s data available showing that they scooped you. Currently there’s nothing. The data doesn’t have to be public until the study is published.

    I think the main barrier would be scientists and the incentives inherent in the system (career, money, prestige) that creates the cheating in the first place.