• Browser makers Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have announced Interop 2024, a project to promote web browser interoperability.
  • JPEG XL, a potential replacement for JPEG and PNG image formats, was not included in Interop 2024.
  • The rejection of JPEG XL has been blamed on Google, with the Google Chrome team deciding not to support the image compression technology.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/nulY6

        • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I still don’t understand. WTF are we talking about. This is tech news, not a celeb scandal. Why can’t we just use simple words !

              • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I did decline a event because it said “Dinner Party” in quotes.

                When they explained, they meant because it’s not really dinner but snacks and board games. Shame. Was expecting orgy

                • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s called “Game Night”

                  Don’t ever go to a game night that is called a “dinner party” anyway. You’re likely to get roped into their self-created board game that is, “okay so it’s got a lot of rules and 1400 pieces, but I’ve written them all down on this 20 page spiral bound document and everyone will get a copy and an hour to read”

                  P.s. Fuck you Aaron, I will never come to your “dinner party” again.

                  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Hahahah, upvote for including the tidbit with your PS and not making us ask.

                    As someone with very limited short-term/working memory, I feel your pain.

    • ted@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 months ago

      Horrible headline.

      Browser maker love-in

      Chromium (used by most browsers)

      snubs

      doesn’t support

      Google-shunned JPEG XL

      JPEG XL (because Google doesn’t like it)

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was chrome and Firefox both who were against the format, both saying too expensive to implement for too small a benefit

    • nikt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Something about love in subs for Google ? And also JPEG?

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think these days that’s the rule, if it piques your interest but you have some trouble understanding headline, you may just click on the article

    • dukatos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The register is doing this shit for years. They are trying to sound smart…