• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    10 months ago

    In fairness, you usualy get severance that is more than 2 weeks, and you don’t even have to go to work to collect it. That said, in like spain, I think they have to employ you until you find a new job or something.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        10 months ago

        Everyone who gets severance is a real human being, I think you’re referring to so-called “people” like myself that are blue collar. Our severance is “don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out, we’ll make you pay to have it cleaned.”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          At least when you’re union your rep hands out step by step instructions on how to file for unemployment and tells you that the company won’t fight it.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, most companies do provide severance when they do massive layoffs. Usually because its required by law in that particular state, sometimes as a way to reduce wrongful termination suits, and( rarely )because it’s the right thing to do.

        But severance is actually fairly common–especially when you hear about the googles, facebooks, amazons of the world doing them.

        I’m pretty sure those googlers that got let go got 6 months salary + benefits.

          • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s a pretty weak source. It reeks of bias and it also seemed to target fast food and gig economy workers. Not exactly who we are discussing in this thread.

            Salaried people from large organizations typically, most of the time, get severance during mass layoffs.

            We arent talking about Lyft deactivating drivers.

            • Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It surveyed over a thousand people and had a margin of error of like 2-3%. Data isn’t really a weak source and it’s better than no source. Do you have anything to support your claim that most workers get severance pay besides you saying so?

              • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                A thousand? My anecdotal evidence covered more than that by just reading a news article about one tech company. I am more than willing to admit there is a huge divide between hourly and salaried employees on this subject. But given that the current news these days is about tech layoffs of salaried people, I took the cartoon to be talking about them.

      • alignedchaos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        What’s crazier than your weirdly combative, out of touch comment is the fact 6 other people decided to upvote it.

        When large corps make news laying off 30% of staff, those people are getting severance packages.

        Did you get lost and end up in the 1850s?

        • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          10 months ago

          Been part of large corp. Was laid off during a “reduction in force”. No severance.

          Non-union/non-CBA covered staff have no legal mandate to receive severance (depending on state). Severance is exclusively between the employer and employee.

          • The_v@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            10 months ago

            Severance today is pretty much and attempt at hush money. In order to get the money, you usually have to agree to not sue them, and keep company information secret. They also often try to toss in non-compete clauses into the terminology.

            The more risk you are to the company, the larger the severance package is.

            My first layoff, I knew the entire companies 5 year plan (I wrote it) and was debating a hefty lawsuit against the head of HR and CEO for illegal termination and retaliation = Full-year severance + full benefits and a placement service. Gave me time to reassess swap to a different area of the industry.

            My second layoff, I knew all of the companies suppliers, plans and strategies. They laid me off and only gave me 10 weeks of severance. I have since fucked them over by talking 95% of their suppliers and over half of their customers. They have had 10% layoffs every year since then. They should have paid me more.

        • chknbwl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was an Assistant Manager of a well-established, popular restaurant franchise about eight years ago now. Business was fine, probably showing a modest black line on their financial reports.

          “This location is no longer in operation.”

          That’s all the advance notice I received when I arrived for my scheduled shift and all the doors were locked. No two-week-notice, no severance package.

          Publicly-traded corporations don’t care about their employees, their only concern lies within how to spend as little money as possible. Employee benefits included.

            • chknbwl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              One demographic are folks who appreciate their employment and subsequently lose said job because of corporate decision, while the other demographic you state are people who make the conscious decision to quit a job. That’s comparing apples to oranges and making a blanket statement about all workers within that industry, or honestly any given industry. Your argument is moot.

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      In addition to what was already written on the matter in this thread, if you don’t have a residence permit, when you’re fired without a prior notice you’ll only have so much time to find another company to hire you. Otherwise it’s a bye-bye and you can go fuck yourself in some other country. I wouldn’t say that’s something that can be easily beaten by a severance at least if it’s not some astronomically huge one like a year of salary or more

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure, but anyone working without a residence permit knows that going in. Noone is say companies are giving out severance from the goodness of thier heart. Just that for most positions 2 weeks notice of quitting is a reasonable ask. And honestly, the company can’t do anything if you don’t give it. It’s really your coworkers who will speak poorly of you to other companies.

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s true, notice from a worker is more a sign of a food workplace relationship, I think