• TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes but one can be less bad than the others. Considering TikTok is the only large (non-Western) social media today that gives a voice to Palestinians being actually genocided (unlike a lot of fake genocide narratives West manufactures), that makes a clear humane distinction. Facebook has documents that tell they want to actively target kids for social media consumption, and also propel rightwing politics a lot.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah I disagree. Ticktok content is way to short to have any meaningful impact. Its just dopamine over and over.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          …and Vines (USA) was the original social media that introduced this format, if you are old enough to remember 6 second clips post Y2K. TikTok merely introduced an unrivaled recommendation algorithm on top of it, similar to what Spotify has for music streaming that gets a lot of praise.

          There are privacy problems with most of them, but atleast I am able to check a TikTok link in browser that friends send me, without it ever harassing me to create account to “view more content” and get surveilled forever.

          The dopamine conversation is a very long one. I have a way too simple and disconnected life. Recommend Huberman’s podcast on dopamine if you want to dive into the biochemistry.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah, I didn’t realize you could use Ticktok in the browser. Anyway I personally won’t use such platforms as they are way to addicting for me.

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I do not use it either, only open links friends send me occasionally. Being able to do that accountless in browser is great. Never bothered to make an account or install it.

              I find all the social medias and most technology incredibly unhealthy and control it a lot. Even go as far as desaturating and making my screens anti-glare and brightness in accordance with room lighting. Never even purchased an AMOLED screen device due to its harmful effects on vision.

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah and nobody in their right mind would ever try to use Vine for journalism. I’m confused why you think Tiktok is different.

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you would have learnt anything in the past decade of social media, it is that these social media companies evolve within months. Telegram became a thing in 2013, Discord in 2015 and TikTok in 2016.

              Vines would have simply increased the limit to 10-15 seconds and it would suddenly be used for journalism. TikTok was originally only 3 (not 30) seconds, now it has a varied time limit upto 10 minutes. Instagram and YouTube copied the TikTok/Vines format. Back then, Instagram also copied Snapchat’s Stories.