• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1098 months ago

    This will be as effective as the do not call registry and CAN-SPAM. Which is to say, it will be a sick joke that won’t do shit by design.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      378 months ago

      I remember signing up for the Do Not Call registry. I got more spam robo calls after signing up than I did before signing up for it. It was a joke.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        688 months ago

        Hey everyone! Here’s a list of phone numbers! Real, legitimate phone numbers! Anyone can view this list of phone numbers, for free!

        But whatever you do, DON’T call anyone on this list, OK??

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      CAN-SPAM is effective for legitimate businesses with something to lose. Several times I’ve ended up on a list with an unsubscribe link that doesn’t work (looking at you, Walgreens). I contact their support, and if they don’t do anything I send them an email demanding they remove me and cc’ing the federal trade commission and my states attorney general. Hasn’t failed yet.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      Honestly what does ban mean here? A fine if and when they do something about it? Maybe?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      298 months ago

      Because there are legitimate reasons for some robo calls. Appointment reminders and confirmations, school weather closure announcements, two-factor login verification, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        208 months ago

        You can do all this things without robo calls. There are no robo calls in Germany for example.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I thought I lived in a pretty backwards part of Germany but your corner must be extremely off the grid!

          To just name one example in Germany: Verification via robo call in WhatsApp.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 months ago

            Oh, I genuinely didn’t know there are robo calls in Germany, never encountered them - always used sms or other kinds of verification. My bad.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              Today, history was made. For the first time someone politely admitted they were wrong on the internet

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 months ago

        It would be a good trade. Lose the few semi-useful legitimate ones to get rid of the overwhelming majority which are malicious scammers and conservative dickbags.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        No there isn’t.

        Text if school is cancelled. Throw 2fa out the window. Phone numbers are not identity. Text appointment reminders. Literally nothing needs a robo voice that isn’t better as text.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 months ago

          Phone numbers actually can be an identity, but generally that’s just business numbers. There’s also a lot of phone numbers that aren’t cell phones and can’t get texts. It’s a lot easier and cheaper for companies to design one system. Depending on the company, they’ll still do text/email reminders for things. Old people like phone calls, so companies need to know their audience too. Again, cheaper to build a single system, so that tends to be the default.

          Source: I design call centers for a living, personally done probably 200+ projects over the years, in banking, insurance, retail, transportation, state/local govt, etc.

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      iirc, they are banned… to cell phones, with very limited exceptions.

      but that relies on honest callers, and sufficient resources being available to adequately enforce.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    358 months ago

    I’m sure they’ll expend the effort to track the offenders down and slap them on the wrist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      Unless they’re evil radical leftist Democrats, those Marxist-Leninist Antifa communist fascist socialists. Then they’ll be hanged.

      MAGAts get a wrist slap.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    208 months ago

    But deceiving people for money is fine? Why this one stipulation? Should just be outright illegal to use deep fake anything to deceive for personal gain, profit, or to hurt others.

  • YeetPics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is this like how the FCC banned robocalls and ensured that a national do not call list is respected?

    Oh boy, we’re saved /s

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To be fair, I don’t think most robocalls these days aren’t domestic in origin

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    Fine? They will be happy to pay the fine if it means they can fool thousands of voters.

    Fines aren’t enough for this kind of behavior.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Fines are enforced with prison. It’s just the portion of wealth and income that determines how much distance is between the two

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately, the FCC probably doesn’t have the power to do much more than fine them. It would probably take congress to pass a bill to have jail time or something.

      I’m purely guessing though

      Reading the article, it sounds like the FCC has enforced similar stuff before. And at up to a $23,000 fine it could add up quickly. And the precedent of previous large fines makes me think this might actually have some teeth.

  • TubeTalkerX
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    I’m sure if they do catch someone that did this the fine will either be $10 or $125.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      108 months ago

      Profit from calls: $42069

      Fine from calls: $2000

      Gee, I wonder why people still break the law?!

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    Oooh that mighty governmental watchdog the FCC?! Oh man, that’s some serious stuff. The only group more deadly serious than the FCC is the FEC. Now those guys you can’t even look at sideways before they take you down.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 months ago

    “This infringes on advertisers constitutional right to deceive the public for personal gain based on our historical tradition of fucking the average american”-US Supreme Court Conservatives.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    Robo-callers usually don’t care at all what the law says. This law will do almost nothing. But it’s the thought that counts.