• shiftymccool@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Arc Browser is better for USERS. Ad companies are just going to have to figure it out. Sounds like a “them” problem to me

    • lurker8008@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Remember Google attempt at DRM for the Internet? That would in effect block this. This and similar are justifying to companies to support Google Chrome only and use their DRM.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I do not remember Google’s attempt at DRM for the Internet, which is an indication of how well it went for their attempt.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I just did a search, and according to the articles I’ve found Google abandoned the “Web Environment Integrity” API in November and removed their prototype from Chromium.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well except that they are continuing with developing it for their Webview browser which is the web browser based of chrome that’s embedded in basically every app anyways.

              Plus Apple has their Web Tokens which are not being fought against which means Google will be desperate to get in on the pie that Apple is getting away with even if it means waiting and coming up with a different name for it.

              It’s still coming. Web DRM and person specific tracking is just around the bend once we get exhausted and distracted enough.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Then I guess I won’t see whatever websites decide to use it (until it’s cracked). Oh well.

                • dustycups@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Does that mean you (and me) end up drowning in a pool of 90% AI dead internet comments while everyone who stayed on Reddit or Facebook can talk to their friends in their WEI tracked & profiled walled garden?

                  Shitty choice.

                  The only solution I can see it robust moderation tools on a platform like Lemmy.

                  AI still gets to read everything but at least individuals/communities/instances can be blocked for bad behaviour.

                  What altertatives do we have right now?

    • TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      No offense but I’m not sure you read or understood the main point of the article — there’s not much of an internet for users if there’s no incentive to supply it with content.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Advertisers are welcome to turn back the clock of enshittification to a time when the internet worked for both publishers and readers. They got greedy and abused the attention of readers, so I have no sympathy. Now this article adds a huge pile of entitlement that we owe them? On top of this excrement