• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They are also not fundamentally brain damaged by years of the inhalation of lead and then being irradiated by one of the worse nuclear disasters of all time.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I knew about the lead for Gen X. Are you talking about both Millennials and Gen Z not having been poisoned in their developmental years or are you referring to Boomers (and older), some of whom were irradiated and/or got hit by smog, etc. It sounds like you’re saying something also happened to Millennials otherwise, and I never heard about this.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, just gen Z. Even a large number of the Millennial population were fairly exposed. Millennial generation starts in 1981, leaded gas didn’t become illegal to sell until 1992. And Chernobyl happened in 1986.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh that’s right, Chernobyl! There were staggered end dates to the sale of leaded gas though, so the years will vary more or less by continent. Nevertheless, your point remains valid even if the lead pollution was at its peak in the 1970s.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Actually only Gen Z will be free of the epigenetic effects. It actually takes 2 gens of not being exposed for a generation not to be affected.