When your foreign policy is “whatever is the opposite of the USSR”
When your foreign policy is “whatever is the opposite of the USSR”
To me, “deeply unserious” sounds like something that would be said either by or about Christopher Hitchens.
Just remembering a few years ago when the Houthi knocked out half of Suadi’s oil production: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VZ01Q/
I was too busy stopping the disolution of the other AES states. You really think it was only the USSR that was supposed to dissolve in 1991?
That’s him. Libertarian socialist who got mad at the writers for his magazine trying organize because he believes the magazine needs an editorial line guided by his vision.
Being a magazine editor is the anarchist to Blanquist “I will make Stalin look like an anarchist” pipeline.
100 total extractions
88 from soldiers
10 from civilians
Who were the remaining two?
The Christians or Jesus’s followers didn’t exactly have an easy time in the aftermath of Jesus’s death. Nowhere near as bad as the Holocaust though.
Sounds like a good basis for an RPG.
“Orwell was right. Here’s a list of subversives the FBI should arrest.”
Liberals write off Texas and Republican states all the time, many think the people in those states deserve to suffer for not supporting Joe Biden
That shit is owned by CEOs that barely understand what the artists they employed made.
Not even, nearly all of these IPs are owned by things that are literally not human.
I think a lot of this is definitional. And I think it’s important to be clear on definitions and that imperialism and colonialism under capitalism are different. However, I also think things that could be categorized as colonial or imperial existed prior to capitalism.
As Lenin wrote:
Colonial policy and imperialism existed before the latest stage of capitalism, and even before capitalism. Rome, founded on slavery, pursued a colonial policy and practised imperialism.
This doesn’t mean the crusades necessarily fall into those categories, but it also doesn’t mean we can simply dismiss it.
I do not think that is a good reading of Ecclesiastes 3, since that’s an crude, anti-dialectical belief that Dril is mocking.
Unity of opposites is core to dialectics, whether those dialectics are materialist or idealist.
Also see Ecc. 3 on the unity of opposites
If Pedro Pascal is anti-zionist, then a Pedro Pascal subreddit should simply ban Zionists
Glad someone else got batman villain vibes from this lol
When Al Ghazzali went after the philosophers, he came up with better book titles