Removed by mod

Careful. Trying to sell Brave as a homophobe web browser won’t hurt it like you guys think.

People here up upvoting baseless conspiracies based on a braindead notice that technology is like magic.

If everything was tracked and harvested by Brave, it’d destroy them much more than the bullshit “homophobe” allegation. Just use network traffic monitors to see if it does. You think people haven’t tried?

Or do you think software can covertly send data without users being able to determine?

It’s open source for fucks sake. Stop with the Alex Jones tier analysis.

I strongly doubt they were banned for posting a police report.

deleted by creator

They don’t delete reports from record when they’re deemed not credible. Not even when they’re proven false.

Nobody wants him locked up now who didn’t want him locked up before this report was released.

The report was made a couple months before the 2020 election. Many others also made wild reports. I saw two others in the Epstein files made literally 6 days for the election.

There are plenty of reasons to make up a story.

But sure, they should go and investigate it. Starting with the woman and her uncle. Oh wait, I bet the uncle is dead. And I bet she took great effort to gather evidence… right…?

This happened before he met Ghislaine and well before all documented abuse victims.

Nothing seems credible. They waited almost 40 years, right before the 2020 election, to say something. And take no efforts to gather corroborating evidence.

The files also contain two other reports about Trump abusing girls, made literally one week before the 2020 election. No corroborating evidence.

That’s not true. You need credible evidence that something illegal happened. An uncorroborated report almost 40 years after the incident, made just weeks before the 2020 election is not credible or useful for prosecution.

Happens all the time in the legal field. I once got a document in discovery that inverted the proper redactions. It was a roster of identifying information, all unredacted except for the actual relevant person in the case — that was redacted. 🤣

Redacting with black boxes over text is more common of a mistake than that.

You actually believe they planted evidence on him?

I’m certainly not renting my home computer…

AI and robotics will continue detecting cancer sooner than humans and performing life saving surgery. Geoengineers will solve climate concerns. Technology will continue to streamline judicial systems, health care, education, leisure…

Meanwhile you’ll contribute nothing except whining that some casualties existed in the wake of all this. Do you not realize how much death and extinction existed before industrialization? Grow the fuck up.

That’s cute to you? 🤮

Surgeons kill dozens of people, hundreds if they work hard enough in their lives. I don’t kill people, therefore they’re evil while I’m not, thus fantasizing about torturing them is okay. This is effectively your logic.

You either have the mental maturity of a 12 year old, or need to take your meds.

These people are at risk of what? Climate disaster in 75 years? Tech, namely geoengineering, is literally the only feasible solution for that.

The Epstein list is simultaneously not released and also contains the names of all the people you don’t like. Convenient.

China has literally a fascist government. Authoritarians that seize corporate control for nationalistic interests while still deferring to original private property owners.

Cult of leadership is typical too. Which includes the satisfaction of citizens.

Makes me laugh when people here laud China. Especially when they’re commies who fell for the lie that China is communism.