Dyno [he/him]

trogdor burninates the peasants; thus he is no comrade

good bot

No, you can’t ask that - it’s whataboutism

Which, coincidentally, was originally coined in Ireland in the 70s, referring to people who defended the IRA

In six days

Literally the most efficient form of land-based transport ever invented. Steel wheels on steel rails have very low rolling resistance.
NAH, it’s bad because you can’t clog up the lines with masses of inefficient, tiny, personal trains.
Also, you have to dig through hills and mountains to lay track - you definitely don’t need to do that for highways (except for all the ones that you do)

Multidimensional Unit

Oh fuck, multiverse warfare is here

I have a soft spot for Suriname’s.
Anything that’s too busy and difficult to parse at a distance is bad.

Im gonna make lancashire hotpot this week, seethe all you like

aside from his mandarin, basically every one of his videos where he ‘speaks fluently’ in one of a hundred other languages involves him basically stammering repeatedly while trying to get out a simple phrase, as though the elongated time it takes him to say
‘I-I-I-I’ve b-b-b-been l-l-learn-ning f-f-f-f-for t-t-two w-w-eeks’ counts as a lengthy, fluent phrase

🧛

it’s a bit like McDonalds rebranding the Big Mac as the Double Burger with Bread in the Middle

what were they doing before, dumping trash in the street?

If the opposite of progress is regress, then the opposite of pronoun must be renoun

i felt the game was a 10/10 until the end, then it became 9/10. all i needed was a witcher 3-style storyboard to cover the impact of my decisions on the wider world

violent/aggressive discourse? i thought sticks and stones could break your bones but words could never harm you

That ‘closest living relative’ joke got a good laugh out of me.
I think people are too harsh on TOW’s politics - if you were expecting an honest to god piece of revolutionary communist fiction, please invite me to whatever version of reality you inhabit.
At least it included some form of political radicals with good morals and nuanced issues rather than just portraying them as naïve misguided fools or mass murderers. Hell, it even has

I don’t think it’s in their capacity to acknowledge that they can be outlefted. If you’re fully sold on the democrat-republican dichotomy, then there’s no room for left critique - you must be a republican.

Every single time, without fail, they assume, as though more certain than they are of their own existence, that the person raising the (valid) point is a republican. Despite the blatantly transparent fact that the statement in question never invokes ‘the libs’, ‘triggered’, ‘maga’, or tags all of the alphabet security agencies, they always fucking rattrap themselves into thinking that anything other than facile patronisation is tantamount to fully supporting whatever it is they’re chastising.
How do they see something like “consequences of capitalism” and still think “Hurr, durr, REPUBLICAN! NEXT!”?