I just made a post about it in tankie the deprogram lmao I was thinking about re-posting it on here but here the link https://www.reddit.com/r/TankieTheDeprogram/comments/1rar0fj/going_mask_off_again/
also here is my older post https://www.reddit.com/r/TankieTheDeprogram/comments/1qp6ltl/discussion_on_a_comment_by_1dime_host_tony_chamas/
thx anyhow
can somebody screenshot the article i cant read it
Thank you do you know if “homo Academicus” is part of his sociological analysis or not?
Yeah and as for Eccos “the name of the rose” I think there even was a movie adaptation for it
Ok thank you for clearing that up
I misread the tweet sorry
deleted by creator
there should totally be a liberation flotilla but who will provide the arms, who will fight, who will give them a navy?
Thanks for also (re)posting your full post also on here :)
I am also currently reading it. Its very economic, thus it can be a bit difficult at first, so take your time taking it all in.
RIP LEGEND
The worst thing is he milked that series. He has so many spin offs, and he even made an illustrated version of it.
Oh, my bad I have read your question wrong.
As for your question regarding the book by Jared Diamond “Guns, Germs, and Steel” I have not yet read it (Maybe I should). Jared Diamond was very briefly covered in my “human evolution minor” though so not sure if that helps but it should signal to you that he is definitely talked about in those circles.
I have met Rutger Bregman though, the author of another book that covers similar things. He had a presentation/talk with the EU greens. So, he is more so libbed up though he at least admits that he writes in a very sensationalist way.
Sadly, the professor that taught the lectures about reviewing and criticising certain historical/archaeological media has passed away in 2023, and with this I believe our faculty has lost the ability/channel to think critically about issues like that.
Hi there I studied archaeology and have read half of the book and critically reviewed it in a class. basically in the book he is trying to give a brief history of the earliest stages of humanity. His takes are very liberal, sensationalist and it doesn’t take he history of other parts of the world into account. He also tends to mix chronologies up a little, like its not written in a linear order which just further helps to confuse the reader. Also for people who study history, archaeology or anthropology it feels a bit hollow.
as someone who studied archaeology just be aware that sapiens is extremely sensationalist
I was just watching Weltspiegel this evening which was so conflating and very biased. They first went like yes trump is bad and all (for the case of greenland) and then they interviewed a “specialist” who was constantly claiming that russia is the biggest threat to greenland and not the actual fact that trump is the main cause in this situation. The rest of that edition consisted out of cuba bashing, interviewing US military trainees in Hawaii (and portraying them as heroic) and really bad coverage on iran. I swear to god it was the most US asslicking bullshit that i have ever seen, and I guess germany is goingto keep sucking trumps dick.
This was so predictable
well one of them is part of the flemish christian conservative party (which want to keep the belgian monarchy), the north italian guy is straight up a nazi they both talk about “traditionality” a lot (of a culture they are not part of, and work together). The dutch couple well they like to appropriate the language of social justice a lot to make themselves look good, but actually hate women and hate the working class they are very elitist and dont mind the dutch royal family… basically i mean nazis
no it was dutch, british, greek, flemish, north italian and dominican libs and conservatives using decolonial theory for the archeaology of the carribean, very elitist very conservatives. They turned me into a scapegoat, though as of 2023 the main investigators (the couple) got caught for academic abuse, bullying ad theft.
I agree with your anger