It shouldn’t hurt at all IMO

It’s still a very mature framework, works with client side apps via DRF if that’s your thing, and has only gotten more quality of life improvements.

There’s things to be desired especially with async but IMO old != bad

Also the last one is “learn python” which… Django is python…

What’s wrong with brave? Iirc they contain all of the ungoogled chrome patches, all of their stupid stuff is opt in AFAIK

Brave actually has a ton of patches to chrome including patching the rendering agent and stuff like that (near par with Firefox on lockdown), to my understanding Vivaldi doesn’t provide most of them in favor of just ad blocking?

Braves patches are all in engine too - they’re a lot deeper then some JavaScript shims a lot of extensions have

https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/68059/vivaldi-browser-privacy-review/12?_=1650994538891

https://github.com/brave/brave-core/blob/master/patches/

Does anyone have any concrete examples of brave violating privacy?

IMO they’ve patched most if not all of the chromium concerns.

I don’t know what type of website you manage where you would even consider blocking chrome, that’s unfortunately roughly 65% of traffic, 70% if you include edge.

Maybe your site is for a niche group of people who mostly Firefox users? I’m just very surprised that’s an option for you as unfortunately chrome is what most people use.

—-

Anyway It looks like you can add headers in your server response to opt out of the calculation.

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/topics/#site-opt-out

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Are you looking for something like GitKraken? It’s electron based, not sure if that’s what you meant.