Not what I’m saying. Just saying if I need speed, I’d use a naturally faster language.

Numpy is good for that. But, I gravitate toward naturally faster langs where I don’t need to import a library for speed. I use Python for simple, dumb scripts.

Nah. I only used AI as a last resort, and in my case, it has worked out. I cannot see myself using AI for codes again.

I don’t understand the code, but it’s good to see you doing things.

Sometimes, I just rewrite my code until it is good enough. Other times, I leave it to my memory, so I can figure it out later. And others, I’m just not happy about it, like the times I did bigbin2dec and it would only work well with something like thread-ripper.

It means that I made changes to code, so that it can work with any multi-threading strategy. G’MIC is a interpretative language with JIT support, and you don’t have any control over automated multi-threading strategy. It can be thread 0 to thread N linearly, or even interleaved. So, the workaround is to make a image of size equal to cpus count, and do the multithreading there.

Yeah, I love image processing, I worked on it for 8+ years now.

I use it for scripting too. I don’t need Python as much as before nowaday.

As always, I do image processing. I’m a G’MIC filter developer. Recently, did some code changes to my combinatorics tools to be insensitive to multi-threaded strategy.

Just use Rust. Eazy Peazy. C++ will likely be still be used because it’s just not realistic for some softwares to switch to a safer programming language.

Uh, that would be infuriating to see. (Yes, I can see tabs in KDE Kate)

What if you use tabs for indentations and space for alignment?

What if you prefer a DSL? I use G’MIC for image processing tasks.

I moved to Waterfox recently. Google Chrome, hell no.

I use states, but no classes. G’MIC is my main language. I do appreciate the functional way of thinking after writing in it for so long. States are just variables that defines the mode of something, right?

I dislike Python as well, but it has it place. I only use it for quick code tests before doing it in other languages.

G’MIC solution

it day2
crop. 0,0,0,{h#-1-2}
split. -,{_'\n'}
foreach { replace_str. " ",";" ({t}) rm.. }

safe_0,safe_1=0
foreach {
	({h}) a[-2,-1] y
	num_of_attempts:=da_size(#-1)+1
	store temp

	repeat $num_of_attempts {

		$temp

		if $> eval da_remove(#-1,$>-1) fi

		eval "
			safe=1;
			i[#-1,1]>i[#-1,0]?(
				for(p=1,p<da_size(#-1),++p,
					if(!inrange(i[#-1,p]-i[#-1,p-1],1,3,1,1),safe=0;break(););
				);
			):(
				for(p=1,p<da_size(#-1),++p,
					if(!inrange(i[#-1,p-1]-i[#-1,p],1,3,1,1),safe=0;break(););
				);
			);
			safe;"

		rm

		if $>
			if ${} safe_1+=1 break fi
		else
			if ${} safe_0,safe_1+=1 break fi
		fi

	}

}

echo Day" "2:" "${safe_0}" :: "${safe_1}

I guess I can try this again in G’MIC.

People should use less Ai, and learn more how to program

Yes. Once you know how, you can see pitfalls with AI.

Interesting, but I never needed AI for coding. Well, twice, and I had to do changes, but would not use AI to generate code.

My small Python (~100 lines of codes) codes aren’t maintainable, but I’m happy with them. I don’t ever plan to work on serious projects with Python, so I can’t say much about it’s maintainability. But, from limited experience, I’d rather use C++, C#, or in my special case, G’MIC if maintainability matters to me.