This entire thread is “tell me you’ve never worked with an ocio in operations” without saying the words. Clearly none of you work in technology and probably screech every time there is a big privacy breach. Location contextual requests are basic shit that nearly every company dealing with any sort of technology compliance does.
They are absolute morons.
That being said you have to be a moron yourself to not be able to understand that it’s the ethics (yes morons, I know) of gay they reference.
Don’t be as dumb as them.
Corporations have done this for decades. Literally.
This is you getting extra pissy because someone wrote an article you only half understand to rile you up.
Most the yuros do. And then they’ll blast you for it behind your back. It’s a continent problem. Y’all lack the context of not needing a common language and it being the default. There is simply little value here beyond academics and arguably some added cultural context. And them of course politeness gets in the way of practice.
I don’t need to speak yuro. Why would I bother learning your mostly valueless languages? They don’t help me travel in Western nations. They won’t get me paid more at my job.
I don’t NEED your silly languages. We are not the same.
I’ve been banned multiple times for saying they should be tried in court and killed. Reddit will happily support the death penalty conversations but not the applicability.
I’m my testing I’ve found most commits quite good when given proper instructions with those concerns. Many need tweaks and fixed but hardly the crap described here by adversarial parties.
Have you tried giving agent instructions on how you’d like your commits to look like?
As for the rest of the complaints and needing to hold hands, sounds like an inexpensive junior developer 🤷♂️ most people in the industry needed their hands held for 5 years.
All of this is mostly irrelevant anyway. You still didn’t address why anything you said here doesn’t apply to human coders or why it you’re getting quality commits and can’t tell from the PR why explicit ID is needed.
The short answer in here would likely be prejudice. You’d argue and take extra scrutiny based on identifying the source.
If you’re going to take random commits from an email address what gives you any confidence that person is going to follow your standards or not be a pain?
I mean if it’s so bad can’t you tell from the pr? Why do you need explicit identification?
ML can absolutely do subjectivity. It just does it differently then humans and can’t be fully trusted.
Because you’ll be prejudiced.
If the code follows standards and best practice it doesn’t matter at all and you shouldn’t care.
Until we get out of this “AI is so good it’s going to take it jobs and also just all slop” and we settle into an increased amount of productivity, it’ll be easier to hide and less effort.
I agree with points in the first half but God what a laughable conclusion.
So much winning.
Sick burn. Do you feel like you’re winning? Browns and queers are being round up and put in camps but you get your dopamine hits punching up at half the base 🤷♂️.
deleted by creator
Where did I post divisive comics or content designed based of 50 year old norms and stereotypes? I’m not quite following your logic.
It wouldn’t shock me to find otherwise, but Clinton seems smart enough to have kept it to ‘day of 18 year olds’. Lots of similar language as the impeachment and seems to be toeing the same line.
Simping pipe wire … That’s a choice.