Yeah I messaged the creator to add them in. I’m pretty lenient on title rules so I like to message instead of delete right away since titles can be easily edited. If it gets reported I’ll remove then messsage though.

I assume Nahida refers to this post https://burggit.moe/post/89839

It’s not marked on pixiv as AI and it has multiple images that look more like regular layering than AI variation https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/102192645

It’s AI art, from here https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/104804026

It seems to also be deleted on the lemmynsfw instance, I think the creator did it since I can’t find an admin removal of the community.

https://lemmynsfw.com/c/pregnanthentai - returns an error, couldnt_find_community

I can do that since the sidebar is basically the same coding as a comment.

I’m not sure exactly how much customization is doable with a lemmy instance but it would certainly liven this place up

I can change the display name, banner/profile image, and what the sidebar says. Other than that there’s no customization towards how it looks.

I enjoyed it and finished the series. I haven’t read the manga yet, but I have read the latest 2 chapters so all I can say on that is “Incest Ahoy!”

The tankoubon is Mashumarori (Marshmallow + Loli) , but this individual chapter is Caramel Loli

Yeah back in 2019.

Countries responded and I don’t think it went anywhere.

Here’s the US response

In the United States, federal law provides that it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene. However, visual depictions (CGI, anime, etc.) where there is not a “real” child are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene)

Japan

Japan therefore proposes to exclude “audio representations” and “written or printed materials” from the third sentence of paragraph 61. "Furthermore, for the reasons explained above, whether criminal penalties should be imposed, even if the case involves pornography of a non-existent child, it needs to be carefully considered. Japan proposes to add “to the extent that it represents an existing child” at the end of paragraph 61.

Somehow this inspired me to whip this up real quick.

I’ve got multiple accounts for different instances, but this is my main one just because they allow me to post content 99% of the other instances really don’t want to deal with.

:(

Yeah, but we’re slow enough that I don’t see it becoming too much of an issue.

I am biased in this situation, but I just think leaving it to the individual to block specific communities is better than blocking an entire instance for every user.