• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
Cake day: December 26th, 2024
  • Surenho@lemmy.wtfto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•tragedy ruleEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    I know this place is full of trolls and whatnots. But it is sad that you’re trying to just give some info about grammar, yet instead of replying with “ok good to know” or “ok thanks”, op answers just “oh I don’t respect English and do not care”. Which sounds more like being afraid of being open about not knowing something, or just insecure. The rest of the replies are also quite hostile. Maybe I’m reading too much into it but it sounds like this place is not growing to be a nice one.

  • Surenho@lemmy.wtftoGames@lemmy.world•Game design question : how to make a "trapped" player character?English
    31·
    7 days ago

    A 3D game where you’re locked inside a tower with tiny windows that allow you to see outside just enough to understand what’s happening out there while the knight navigates the fortress/castle. You have multiple forms of influencing what the knight does and what transpires outside (sending letters and packages with items, crafting said items or potions, using magic, commanding assistance from other loyal servants, distracting enemies, unveiling traps and puzzles to aid in the quest). The place can be a tower with multiple floors and as you progress you might gain access to new floors of tools, while also having maybe “putting out fires” elements such as keeping a dragon asleep with music, filling a moat so evil minions cannot cross, sending equipment and maybe even firing/camping enemies like a sniper but with a crossbow or smthn.

    You make them feel trapped by limiting what they can see and do. When things go out of sight or cannot communicate effectively with the knight and limits their actions it then forces succinctness to their effect on their own rescue.

    Dunno just an idea :)

  • Surenho@lemmy.wtftoRPGMemes @ttrpg.network•Also know as the Emily Axford approach English
    4·
    14 days ago

    Unpopular opinion maybe, but the take on being “I made a thing” narrator and a “I’ll break your thing” player feels like missing the point to me. I mean, you can build that dynamic and have fun if that’s what you’re into, but it is still collaborative, just that the narrator pretends to be challenged. In most ttrpgs, the narrator has almost complete control over the game. You can try to “compete” but it is never a real match, as the narrator can make your character/s disappear in an instant if she/he/they want. So this supposed pissing contest is really more like a dad playing pretend like he got bested by his kids in a fight. Which shows that this was never the point.

    What to me really makes it work is setting up scenarios with a lot of input from the players and seeing the game unfold wherever they might take it. The narrator is given that power precisely because it should try to avoid controlling the story as much as it can, and instead interpret the world around the players (as if the world is the character the narrator controls) to develop surprising and captivating situations and events that play off of everyone at the table.

    Also related, “Dungeon master” sounds outdated, as it points to a person that controls a 1 vs many boardgames like Descent, Mansions of Madness or Imperial Assault. Which is why the collaborative storytelling is, to me, what sets it apart from other games. One can definitely have competitive storytelling (Everyone is John), but lets not kid ourselves thinking that’s what goes on in most ttrpg games being played.