Damn. I thought I was cynical, but nowhere near as cynical as OpenAI is, apparently.
Damn. I thought I was cynical, but nowhere near as cynical as OpenAI is, apparently.
One thing to keep in mind about Ptacek is that he will die on the stupidest of hills. Back when Y Combinator president Garry Tan tweeted that members of the San Francisco board of supervisors should be killed, Ptacek defended him to the extent that the mouth-breathers on HN even turned on him.
Same. Iām not being critical of lab-grown meat. I think itās a great idea.
But the pattern of things heās got an opinion on suggests a familiarity with rationalist/EA/accelerationist/TPOT ideas.
Do you have a link? Iām interested. (Also, I see you posted something similar a couple hours before I did. Sorry I missed that!)
So it turns out the healthcare assassin has someā¦ boutiqueā¦ views. (Yeah, I know, shocker.) Things he seems to be into:
How soon until someone finds his LessWrong profile?
As anyone whoās been paying attention already knows, LLMs are merely mimics that provide the āillusion of understandingā.
Iām noticing that people who criticize him on that subreddit are being downvoted, while heās being upvoted.
I wouldnāt be surprised if, as part of his prodigious self-promotion of this overlong and tendentious screed, heās steered some of his more sympathetic followers to some of these forums.
Actually itās the wikipedia subreddit thread I meant to refer to.
As a longtime listener to Tech Wonāt Save Us, I was pleasantly surprised by my phoneās notification about this weekās episode. David was charming and interesting in equal measure. I mostly knew Jack Dorsey as the absentee CEO of Twitter who let the site stagnate under his watch, but there were a lot of little details about his moderation-phobia and fash-adjacency that I wasnāt aware of.
By the way, I highly recommend the podcast to the TechTakes crowd. They cover many of the same topics from a similar perspective.
For me it gives off huge Dr. Evil vibes.
If you ever get tired of searching for pics, you could always go the lazy route and fall back on AI-generated images. But then youād have to accept the reality that in few years your posts would have the analog of a geocities webring stamped on them.
Trace seems a bitā¦ emotional. You ok, Trace?
But will my insurance cover a visit to Dr. Spicy Autocomplete?
So now Steve Sailer has shown up in this essayās comments, complaining about how Wikipedia has been unfairly stifling scientific racism.
Birds of a feather and all that, I guess.
what is the entire point of singling out Gerard for this?
Heās playing to his audience, which includes a substantial number of people with lifetime subscriptions to the Unz Review, Takiās crapazine and Mankind Quarterly.
why it has to be quite that long
Welcome to the rationalist-sphere.
Scott Alexander, by far the most popular rationalist writer besides perhaps Yudkowsky himself, had written the most comprehensive rebuttal of neoreactionary claims on the internet.
Hey Trace, since youāre undoubtedly reading this thread, Iād like to make a plea. I know Scott Alexander Siskind is one of your personal heroes, but maybe you should consider digging up some dirt in his direction too. You might learn a thing or two.
Please touch grass.
The next AI winter canāt come too soon. Theyāre spinning up coal-fired power plants to supply the energy required to build these LLMs.
Until a month ago, TW was the long-time researcher for āBlocked and Reportedā, the podcast hosted by Katie āTERFā Herzog and relentless sealion Jesse Singal.
As someone who also went to university in the late 80s and early 90s, I didnāt share his experiences. This reads like one of those silly shaggy-dog stories where everyone says sarcastically afterwards: āyeah that happenedā.