Some of the moderators that run lemmygrad.ml also run this one, I’m pleading my case until someone does something about it.

I can’t seem to find where I can formally post it in “lemmygrad.ml”.

Cut throat environments!

“Retro Music”
https://github.com/RetroMusicPlayer/RetroMusicPlayer
https://www.f-droid.org/packages/code.name.monkey.retromusic/

Feature the following:
Base 3 themes (Clearly White, Kinda Dark and Just Black)
Chromecast support
Choose from 10+ now playing themes
Driving Mode
Headset/Bluetooth support
Music duration filter
Android Auto support
Wallpaper accent picker on Android 8.1+
Material You support on Android 12+
Monet themed icon support on Android 13+
Folder support - Play songs by folder
Gapless playback
Volume controls
Carousel effect for album covers
Home screen widgets
Lock screen playback controls
Lyrics screen (download and sync with music)
Sleep timer
Easy drag to sort playlist & play queue
Tag editor
Create, edit and import playlists
Playing queue with reorder
User profile
30+ languages support (help translate the project: Crowdin
Browse and play your music by songs, albums, artists, playlists and genre
Smart Auto Playlists - Recently played, most played and history

Sorry for the delay, haven’t checked Lemmy for a while, The pattern isn’t repeated with me, if I could easily share a screenshot of the app I would have shared it.

I always reverse engineer troublesome apps (To put it lightly) to disable the ability of screenshot, among other changes (don’t rely on internal feature).

Recommend Jerboa, I also have small amounts of comments that can’t be loaded. Not in this thread, at least for now.

Can you include a link of your thread, check whether there’s a pattern.

They’re constructed hierarchy not natural (That hints that someone didn’t want to be the fuckup alone & created a destructive system for everyone) otherwise we would be living in a socialist utopia.

I invite everyone to listen to this episode, The history of humanity with Christopher Knight https://www.historicly.net/p/the-history-of-humanity-with-christopher

I hope it was in an airgapped environment.

Mozilla opposes a proposal because it goes against their principles and vision for the Web.
They believe that any browser, server, or publisher that follows common standards should be considered part of the Web.
Standards are designed to be independent of specific hardware or software, allowing for a wide range of devices, operating systems, and browsers to access the Web.
This diversity of choices promotes accessibility and overcomes personal obstacles.
Mechanisms that restrict these choices harm the openness of the Web and are not beneficial for users.

The proposal’s use cases rely on the ability to detect non-human traffic, which could hinder assistive technologies, automatic testing, and archiving and search engine spiders.
These tools require access to content intended for humans in order to transform, test, index, and summarize it.
The proposed safeguards are unlikely to be effective and fail to address these concerns adequately.

Mozilla acknowledges the importance of addressing fraud and invalid traffic but finds the proposal lacking in practical progress for the listed use cases and highlights clear downsides to its adoption.

“Someone tweeted at him” Narrative built for liability reasons.

It’s a crucifix to taunt the masses due to how powerless we are against the elites and their pawns.

For more contexts: St. Andrew’s Cross or the Saltire Cross.

Narrative built for liability reasons.

It’s a crucifix to taunt the masses due to how powerless we are against the elites and their pawns.

For more contexts: St. Andrew’s Cross or the Saltire Cross.

So much for green while supporting unsustainability with Microsoft closed source products (Yeah there’s apple too, giving that one the benefits of the doubts for now), plus the addiction industry of processed food and sugar & nootropics.

That’s object-oriented neural programming, stereotypical with corporate advertisements.

There are plenty already, why not a joint?
More solidarity/less division would be nice but it doesn’t mean that some individuals wouldn’t need to prove themselves to the tasks.

Without accountability it’s moot but it’s not like it’s possible with the current technological advancements & as always they create a hierarchy about fucking everything.

Pretty sure you’re describing most if not all the developer’s demographics, coding can always be optimized.
The same goes for a lot of things we do in life (Productivity).

Ever thought about checking Purism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purism_(company)?wprov=sfla1

If that’s the case, you wouldn’t be limited to a desktop.
Android users can also install the userscript using Firefox,

• https://www.xda-developers.com/mozilla-general-extension-support-firefox-for-android-nightly/
• https://www.ghacks.net/2022/10/20/firefox-beta-for-android-now-supports-custom-add-on-collections/

1. Sign Up/In to your account & add all the necessary add-ons to the collection in it starting with the one already compatible with our browser otherwise, the list will be empty.
   https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/
2. Go to the Settings page, scroll down to the bottom.
3. Tap on “About Firefox”.
4. Tap on the Firefox logo 5 times. It will display a message that says “Debug Menu enabled”.
   If you go back to the Settings page, you’ll notice that a new option is available under the Advanced section.
   It’s called Custom Add-on Collections.
   Tap on it, and it will ask you to enter the collection owner’s ID, and the collection’s name.
   The ID is a unique 6-digit number that can be found in your add-on collection’s URL.
   The name of course refers to the collection’s name, unlike the number this is something that you can choose.
   For example,
   https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/***926754***/***ghacks***/
   The ID for this collection is 926754 and the name is ghacks.

FYI using this method with Mull & Tampermonkey.

Have you read the pfSense documentation, you do need a set of compatible hardware so the firewall becomes functional:

• https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/hardware/index.html

The best way to ensure that hardware is compatible with pfSense software is to buy hardware from the Netgate Store that has been tested and known to work well with pfSense software. The hardware in the store is tested with each release of pfSense software and is tuned for optimal performance.
For home-built solutions, the FreeBSD Hardware Notes for the FreeBSD version used in a given build of pfSense software is the best resource for determining hardware compatibility. pfSense software version 2.6.0-RELEASE is based on 12.3-STABLE@ef1e43df92c6. Another good resource is the Hardware section of the FreeBSD FAQ.

At some point I was doing it each 2 weeks due to the inability to secure it, another OS though that I rather stay nameless. It May or may not start with the character W.

Typo!

The irony is lost on me, how about using KeePass

https://lmddgtfy.net/?q=site%3Agithub.com keepass