

A pal: āI take back everything I ever said about humanoid robots being uselessā
And⦠same


A pal: āI take back everything I ever said about humanoid robots being uselessā
And⦠same


Impressive side fact: looks like they sent him an unsolicited email generated by a fucking llm? An impressive failure to read the fucking room.
Not like that exact bullshit has been attempted on the community at large by other shitheads last year, but then originality was never the clanker wankersā strength


Hereās a substack post (sorry) with a quote I found both neat and pretty funny:
Integrity comes from the Latin āinteger,ā meaning whole or complete. A person with integrity is āwholeā in the sense that their words, actions, and values are unified rather than fragmented or contradictory. They understand themselves; they have integrated the warring parts of themselves; and they respect and act on the values that their parts can agree upon.
Rationalists in shambles


Something intensely satisfying seeing this the same week as id software becoming a union shop.


Workers organizing against genai policies in the workplace: http://workersdecide.tech/
Sounds like exactly the thing unions and labor organizing is good for. Glad to see it.


Theyāre doing eugenics ads on the nyc subway https://hexa.club/@phooky/115640559205329476


Yup thatās one of them. The cryptonomicon protagonist no-nut-Novembering all the way to the ww2 treasure is another special fave


Lmao imagine reading a Stephenson book and being peeved that it ends
(His sex scenes are far far far worse than his endings, those are a mercy)


Ah yes, the classic open source guy stance of āyou get to praise me publicly but direct criticism or problems to [over there]ā


PR for AI slop generated DWARF support for ocaml. Expectation: doesnāt work
Reality: replicates existing support from another project including attribution to the author.


I would love this, lmfao


Claims to be against politics in the workplace, takes down rightwing websites anyway


This might be one of those ācareful what you wish forā scenarios. The neutral outcome might well be that they generate dialog with training data from Scots Wikipedia. Or Scots Grokipedia I guess


Oh look at that, another report on the economics of ai datacenter buildouts https://publicenterprise.org/report/bubble-or-nothing/


Eh, how often can one guy be right


Rolling Stone on the emergence of the ai chatbot psychosis religion


A fact-generative AI, you say? https://aphyr.com/posts/398-the-future-of-fact-checking-is-lies-i-guess


Just saw this post on DHH, itās really good: https://okayfail.com/2025/in-praise-of-dhh.html
If youāre not careful, one day you will wake up and find that youāve pushed away every person who ever disagreed with you.


Living a life as if it was able to bear a āI bought one before I knew he was a jerkā bumper sticker.
I wouldnāt worry about it, they are bad enough to ignore. The whole āit feels bad to use but thatās why Unix is greatā reactionary aesthetic doesnāt lead to great software, after all