It could certainly be used as evidence in your favor. Whether it by itself would be enough to exonerate you would depend on things like the evidence against you and how much weight the jury gave to your records.

These are known as souvenir plots. Generally, you aren’t buying the land, but rather you’re buying a contractual right to prevent the actual owner from developing the land.

Californian. No.

It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

Californian. No.

It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

Insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

From what I can tell it’s a tweet in which they “recommend” his nomination, rather than nominate him themselves.

While members of national legislatures are allowed to nominate people for a Nobel prize, national governments per se are not.

Try HTTrack: https://www.httrack.com/

These are the same Senators who argued ex-presidents can’t be impeached.

Jobs being made obsolete by new technology is one thing.

Artists having their works taken and profited off of without consent, attribution, or compensation is another.

He will portray Neevok, half man, half dog, half orchid.

The GTX1660 I bought in 2023 for $300 is still running fine.

That detail is conspicuously absent from the announcement itself.

According to South Park, 22.3 years is the amount of time that has to pass before something tragic can become funny.

Hard to believe it’s been more than 22.3 years since 9/11.

How did you post a empty comment?

Terrible technique. Everyone knows it’s left hands only.

The state government isn’t involved with collecting federal taxes, so how could this be done?

Usually only the first time. Subsequent playthroughs no.