chauncey [he/him]

  • 1 Post
  • 28 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 2nd, 2020

help-circle








  • Lots of folks in here debating what he wrote as correct or not.

    When I first took the time to actually read Bin Ladens reasoning I remember being caught really off guard as we were blasted with messaging via the news and through political speeches that 9/11 happened because “terrorists hate our freedom” etc.

    So just taking the time to actually read what the guy said - regardless of whether he was correct or not - and realizing the disconnect with what I had been told to be his reasoning, had an impact on me. This was over a decade ago.

    I think that alone is important.


  • Marx & Engels’ "Address of the Central Authority to the League, March, 1850”:

    [T]hat everywhere worker’s candidates are put up alongside the bourgeois democratic candidates, that they are as far as possible members of the League, and that their election is promoted by all means possible. Even when there is no prospect whatever of their being elected, the workers must put up their own candidates in order to preserve their independence, to count their forces and to lay before the public their revolutionary attitude and party standpoint. In this connection they must not allow themselves to be bribed by such arguments of the democrats as, for example, that by so doing they are splitting the democratic party and giving the reactionaries the possibility of victory. The ultimate purpose of all such phrases is to dupe the proletariat. The advance which the proletariat party is bound to make by such independent action is infinitely more important than the disadvantage that might be incurred by the presence of a few reactionaries in the representative body. If from the outset the democrats come out resolutely and terroristically against the reactionaries, the influence of the latter in the elections will be destroyed in advance.