You had said “Allegedly they can shoot down Russian planes, because their targeting systems have longer range.”

My post was to share information to indicate that is not so - F16 does not have longer range.

The rest, you and Tom are in agreement.

The reverse is probably going to be true, unfortunately. The F16s weaponry is still based on 70s/80s engagement envelopes, more modern Russian a/c use missiles/radar that have much further range. The F16s will be most effective where UKR has additional anti-air assets to keep the more modern a/c away.

A very good breakdown of this by someone who’s studied military aircraft for a living…

https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/its-the-range-stupid-part-1
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/its-the-range-stupid-part-2
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16s-for-ukraine
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16s-for-ukraine-51d
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16-for-ukraine

whynotboth.gif trolololol.gif ;)

Firefly (and it’s movie, Serenity). I just didn’t enjoy them, just didn’t click with me.

Day After Tomorrow - the real, inverted (Hot not Cold) version.

I tried a Creality Ender 3 a couple of years ago. Struggled a lot, for me, it required a lot of aftermarket replacements to make it work well. I sold it about 6 mo later.

In Mar, I bought an Anycubic Kobra. Out of the box, worked like a champ and has continued to. None of the struggles I had with the Ender. Only add on was a sensor to let me know when I’m out of filament.

You’ll probably hear from folks who bought an Ender and had great success, and folks who struggled w/a Kobra, though. It’s like an automobile… you’re going to hear good and bad stories for each model.

Honestly, I read a lot of articles and just found what fit my use case, expectations and budget. Your first one will definitely be a learning experience.

Good luck!

If it’s dimensions are suitable, it will assume a sedentary position.

Heh. Nope, 30something in the 90s. Just enjoyed good sci-fi then :D

So many good ones named, but I’m going to go with

1. The Hammerhead from “Space: Above & Beyond”

2. Any/all of the fighter ships from the video game series “Wing Commander”

3. How come nobody’s mentioned the fantastic Eagle Transporter System from Space-1999???

It’s a good search target for what has happened up to 12 Jun 23… after that? I can go incognito to reddit, get what I need then come back to here and continue using this as a resource and share what I’ve got.

I played “Advanced Dungeons & Dragons” on the Intellivision that my g/f had at the time. Most everyone else had Atari 2600s, so it felt rare (at the time) to play on it. It had a funky controller with weird keypads and a disc that was like a joystick, but hard to play with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Dungeons_%26_Dragons:_Cloudy_Mountain

Aren’t the batteries and electric motors driving the grid fins at the top of the booster? That and the entire interstage are gonna get blasted with the thrust plume of three Raptors. Reinforcing them enough that it doesn’t affect planned reusability targets could take a bigger bite out of the payload than they get from hot staging.

That was my first thought, or that the header tank up at the top might not like being heated like that.

I’m sure they’ll figure out pretty quickly if it works or not.

Going to be interested in how they make that work with the intended recoverability of the booster. Excitement guaranteed, for sure!

I think Soyuz boosters currently do hot staging, the interstage is open IIRC.