degenerate_neutron_matter

It was never a free feature; they used to only allow up to 2X speed. Not that that justifies it at all of course.

Did you need to use the Google slop machine to tell you that?

If you want to avoid being marked as spam I’d just go with .com, it’s as mainstream as you’ll get and only $10/year or so from a good registrar.

+1 for mailbox.org, been using them for nearly a year and am quite happy with their service. Do note that their web UI is mediocre so you’ll probably want to use a mail client.

And definitely use a custom domain, they’re super cheap and allow for so much more flexibility (such as dedicated emails for different services).

DNS based ad blocking does not block YouTube advertisements.

Not really, but dying in a car crash sounds like an awful way to go.

I guess it makes it easier to find/verify the owner if they lose it? (Though there are better ways to do that). Still feels weird.

Sort your data into stuff you absolutely need to keep (personal files and such) and stuff you’d be okay with losing (less important files, device backups, downloads you can redownload, etc). Then only back up the former. As for backup medium, ServerPartDeals often has some pretty good deals on storage; they were selling refurbished 12TB drives for $80 a pop a while back.

Most people aren’t choosing to enable OneDrive; it’s enabled by default, and not obvious how to disable.

This isn’t Reddit, you don’t need to engagement bait.

Neptune looking real blue there as well.

A Falcon 9 does a pretty good job.

People are too used to using the downvote button as an “I dislike this” button, and that carries over here. Solid unpopular opinion though; I wholeheartedly disagree.

Lesbian rule

Our girlfriend

Some of these hardly qualify as fireworks; they look more like straight up bombs.

Popular opinion, downvoted.

What browser extension are you referring to? I don’t see a link. And yeah, they’re not the worst place to donate money to but they have plenty already.

Total RAM usage is a poor benchmark. Windows (and all other major OSes) cache frequently accessed files in free memory to avoid having to read them from disk every time they’re accessed. The cache is freed when the memory is needed, so it doesn’t impact how much memory applications can use, and thus shouldn’t be included in usage benchmarks.

However, Task Manager counts cache memory towards the total usage, which tends to confuse people who think Windows is using way more memory than it actually is. I’m sure the article’s conclusions about memory usage are still mostly correct, but it’s good to keep in mind.

Human heaven is also cow hell, it’s a very efficient system.