ugh

  • 1 Post
  • 48 Comments
Joined 8 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 21st, 2025

help-circle




  • Yea… uhhh. I have no happy thoughts on any of this, to be frank. We kind of need a miracle? Historically speaking, though - we are looking at what any other population saw as they went from democracy to dictatorship. Not much comfort in that. All I have been doing is building curated news sources in RSS and getting to know friendly decentralized communities. The sooner I can get off the Meta based socials, the better. Also, I have been reading about past dictatorships. I’m learning about the Nicaraguan one right now. Lot’s of parallels. The one silver lining, I guess, is - after a while most dictatorships turn thier own supporters… violently. Yay?








  • He sucks and we all knew that. But here’s the fucked up thing…

    Imo, this is the first documented fake “journalist” embedding themselves in what is essentially military aggressions on the mil’s own soil and pretty much against its own people. We see these turdbags embedded with the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan (Geraldo was never a real journalist)… and this is kind of like that. We are now at the point where the right feels comfortable enough with this shit to start televising the abuse on groups of people they hate.









  • An easier to read summary -

    China’s technology transfers and their impacts -

    Key Focus: The article examines whether Chinese technology transfers, specifically from Huawei, help recipient governments expand digital surveillance and repression. The study focuses on Huawei as it’s the world’s largest telecommunications provider and has significant data available about its transfers.

    Main Findings: The effects of Huawei technology transfers depend heavily on the recipient country’s political institutions:

    In autocracies: Transfers lead to increased digital surveillance, internet shutdowns, internet filtering, and targeted arrests for online content In democracies: No clear or consistent evidence of increased digital repression

    Key Data Points: Study covers 153 Huawei projects worth approximately $1.6 billion Spans 64 countries between 2000-2017 About 90% of projects by value are in the communications sector Asia and Africa account for over 85% of total transfers

    What Drives Huawei Transfers: Market size (population) Demand for low-cost telecommunications Prior relationships with China through aid Notably, transfers are NOT primarily driven by:

    Natural resource endowments Regime type Political instability

    Important Context: China has developed sophisticated domestic surveillance capabilities Huawei often incorporates technologies from smaller Chinese firms Technology transfers are “dual-use” - they can be used for both legitimate development and repression

    Why Different Effects in Democracies vs. Autocracies:

    Different Motivations: Autocracies: Often seek technology to control dissent and prevent collective action Democracies: More likely to use technology for public goods and economic development

    Different Constraints: Democracies: Have institutional guardrails (courts, media, civil society) that limit misuse Autocracies: Fewer checks and balances on government power

    Limitations of the Study:

    • Difficulty measuring digital repression
    • Secrecy around Huawei contracts may lead to incomplete data
    • Lack of detailed information about specific transfer provisions

    The research suggests that while Chinese technology transfers can enable digital repression, this outcome isn’t inevitable - it depends significantly on the recipient country’s existing political institutions and oversight mechanisms.